Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Omnidirectional return values for storm severit...
View graph of relations

Omnidirectional return values for storm severity from directional extreme value models: The effect of physical environment and sample size

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Omnidirectional return values for storm severity from directional extreme value models: The effect of physical environment and sample size. / Randell, D.; Zanini, E.; Vogel, M. et al.
ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: Volume 4A: Structures, Safety and Reliability. ASME, 2014. V04AT02A013.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Randell, D, Zanini, E, Vogel, M, Ewans, K & Jonathan, P 2014, Omnidirectional return values for storm severity from directional extreme value models: The effect of physical environment and sample size. in ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: Volume 4A: Structures, Safety and Reliability., V04AT02A013, ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-23156

APA

Randell, D., Zanini, E., Vogel, M., Ewans, K., & Jonathan, P. (2014). Omnidirectional return values for storm severity from directional extreme value models: The effect of physical environment and sample size. In ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: Volume 4A: Structures, Safety and Reliability Article V04AT02A013 ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-23156

Vancouver

Randell D, Zanini E, Vogel M, Ewans K, Jonathan P. Omnidirectional return values for storm severity from directional extreme value models: The effect of physical environment and sample size. In ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: Volume 4A: Structures, Safety and Reliability. ASME. 2014. V04AT02A013 doi: 10.1115/OMAE2014-23156

Author

Randell, D. ; Zanini, E. ; Vogel, M. et al. / Omnidirectional return values for storm severity from directional extreme value models: The effect of physical environment and sample size. ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: Volume 4A: Structures, Safety and Reliability. ASME, 2014.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{8cc5c38af5a14d37adcc528c69e8ca18,
title = "Omnidirectional return values for storm severity from directional extreme value models: The effect of physical environment and sample size",
abstract = "Ewans and Jonathan [2008] shows that characteristics of extreme storm severity in the northern North Sea vary with storm direction. Jonathan et al. [2008] demonstrates, when directional effects are present, that omnidirectional return values should be estimated using a directional extreme value model. Omnidirectional return values so calculated are different in general to those estimated using a model which incorrectly assumes stationarity with respect to direction. The extent of directional variability of extreme storm severity depends on a number of physical factors, including fetch variability. Our ability to assess directional variability of extreme value parameters and return values also improves with increasing sample size in general. In this work, we estimate directional extreme value models for samples of hind-cast storm peak significant wave height from locations in ocean basins worldwide, for a range of physical environments, sample sizes and periods of observation. At each location, we compare distributions of omnidirectional 100-year return values estimated using a directional model, to those (incorrectly) estimated assuming stationarity. The directional model for peaks over threshold of storm peak significant wave height is estimated using a non-homogeneous point process model as outlined in Randell et al. [2013]. Directional models for extreme value threshold (using quantile regression), rate of occurrence of threshold ex-ceedances (using a Poisson model), and size of exceedances (using a generalised Pareto model) are estimated. Model parameters are described as smooth functions of direction using periodic B-splines. Parameter estimation is performed using maximum likelihood estimation penalised for parameter roughness. A bootstrap re-sampling procedure, encompassing all inference steps, quantifies uncertainties in, and dependence structure of, parameter estimates and omnidirectional return values. Copyright {\textcopyright} 2014 by ASME.",
keywords = "Maximum likelihood, Maximum likelihood estimation, Sampling, Storms, Uncertainty analysis, Water waves, Bootstrap resampling, Dependence structures, Directional effects, Parameter estimate, Peaks over threshold, Physical environments, Quantile regression, Significant wave height, Parameter estimation",
author = "D. Randell and E. Zanini and M. Vogel and K. Ewans and P. Jonathan",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1115/OMAE2014-23156",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780791845424",
booktitle = "ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering",
publisher = "ASME",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Omnidirectional return values for storm severity from directional extreme value models: The effect of physical environment and sample size

AU - Randell, D.

AU - Zanini, E.

AU - Vogel, M.

AU - Ewans, K.

AU - Jonathan, P.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Ewans and Jonathan [2008] shows that characteristics of extreme storm severity in the northern North Sea vary with storm direction. Jonathan et al. [2008] demonstrates, when directional effects are present, that omnidirectional return values should be estimated using a directional extreme value model. Omnidirectional return values so calculated are different in general to those estimated using a model which incorrectly assumes stationarity with respect to direction. The extent of directional variability of extreme storm severity depends on a number of physical factors, including fetch variability. Our ability to assess directional variability of extreme value parameters and return values also improves with increasing sample size in general. In this work, we estimate directional extreme value models for samples of hind-cast storm peak significant wave height from locations in ocean basins worldwide, for a range of physical environments, sample sizes and periods of observation. At each location, we compare distributions of omnidirectional 100-year return values estimated using a directional model, to those (incorrectly) estimated assuming stationarity. The directional model for peaks over threshold of storm peak significant wave height is estimated using a non-homogeneous point process model as outlined in Randell et al. [2013]. Directional models for extreme value threshold (using quantile regression), rate of occurrence of threshold ex-ceedances (using a Poisson model), and size of exceedances (using a generalised Pareto model) are estimated. Model parameters are described as smooth functions of direction using periodic B-splines. Parameter estimation is performed using maximum likelihood estimation penalised for parameter roughness. A bootstrap re-sampling procedure, encompassing all inference steps, quantifies uncertainties in, and dependence structure of, parameter estimates and omnidirectional return values. Copyright © 2014 by ASME.

AB - Ewans and Jonathan [2008] shows that characteristics of extreme storm severity in the northern North Sea vary with storm direction. Jonathan et al. [2008] demonstrates, when directional effects are present, that omnidirectional return values should be estimated using a directional extreme value model. Omnidirectional return values so calculated are different in general to those estimated using a model which incorrectly assumes stationarity with respect to direction. The extent of directional variability of extreme storm severity depends on a number of physical factors, including fetch variability. Our ability to assess directional variability of extreme value parameters and return values also improves with increasing sample size in general. In this work, we estimate directional extreme value models for samples of hind-cast storm peak significant wave height from locations in ocean basins worldwide, for a range of physical environments, sample sizes and periods of observation. At each location, we compare distributions of omnidirectional 100-year return values estimated using a directional model, to those (incorrectly) estimated assuming stationarity. The directional model for peaks over threshold of storm peak significant wave height is estimated using a non-homogeneous point process model as outlined in Randell et al. [2013]. Directional models for extreme value threshold (using quantile regression), rate of occurrence of threshold ex-ceedances (using a Poisson model), and size of exceedances (using a generalised Pareto model) are estimated. Model parameters are described as smooth functions of direction using periodic B-splines. Parameter estimation is performed using maximum likelihood estimation penalised for parameter roughness. A bootstrap re-sampling procedure, encompassing all inference steps, quantifies uncertainties in, and dependence structure of, parameter estimates and omnidirectional return values. Copyright © 2014 by ASME.

KW - Maximum likelihood

KW - Maximum likelihood estimation

KW - Sampling

KW - Storms

KW - Uncertainty analysis

KW - Water waves

KW - Bootstrap resampling

KW - Dependence structures

KW - Directional effects

KW - Parameter estimate

KW - Peaks over threshold

KW - Physical environments

KW - Quantile regression

KW - Significant wave height

KW - Parameter estimation

U2 - 10.1115/OMAE2014-23156

DO - 10.1115/OMAE2014-23156

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SN - 9780791845424

BT - ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering

PB - ASME

ER -