Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Online learning

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Online learning: a scoping of the literature for a study in integrated palliative care

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineMeeting abstractpeer-review

Published

Standard

Online learning: a scoping of the literature for a study in integrated palliative care. / Hughes, Sean; Preston, Nancy; Payne, Sheila.
In: Palliative Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 6, 06.2014, p. 831-832.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineMeeting abstractpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hughes S, Preston N, Payne S. Online learning: a scoping of the literature for a study in integrated palliative care. Palliative Medicine. 2014 Jun;28(6):831-832. doi: 10.1177/0269216314532748

Author

Bibtex

@article{7b9864d108ad46cfb4fa1a63f2bfc12f,
title = "Online learning: a scoping of the literature for a study in integrated palliative care",
abstract = "BackgroundA study of patient-centered integrated palliative care pathways in advanced cancer and chronic disease, InSup-C (EC FP7 funded) plans to develop online learning modules to disseminate and promote best practice in this field across Europe. AimsTo identify the key components of effective online learning models in higher and professional development education with particular reference to palliative and end of life care contexts.MethodsA search was conducted for papers that reported peer reviewed studies using MEDLINE, ERIC, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO and Academic Search Complete databases. The main subject term: online learning, was used in combination with evaluat*, research, palliative, and end of life as free text terms. This yielded 1441 results. Further filtering and removing duplicates reduced this to 1084 of which 26 papers were selected for narrative review. Of these, four studies evaluated purely online (un-moderated, asynchronous) learning inputs, 10 were reviews or meta-analyses, and 12 considered online components of blended learning courses.FindingsEvidence for the effectiveness of un-moderated learning was equivocal and where part of a blended approach, confounded by other factors such as tutor input or peer interaction. Reported positive effects included improved access for remote learners and those with resource constraints, and increased flexibility for those studying alongside work commitments. ConclusionsPublished results of evaluative research into purely un-moderated, online educative tools were relatively few. There is a need for better research into the efficacy of these approaches given that there is evidence of their increasing use in palliative and end of life care education. In designing new material for its project, InSup-C will incorporate robust evaluative techniques at the module design stage. ",
author = "Sean Hughes and Nancy Preston and Sheila Payne",
year = "2014",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1177/0269216314532748",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "831--832",
journal = "Palliative Medicine",
issn = "0269-2163",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",
note = "8th World Research Congress of the European Association for Palliative Care ; Conference date: 05-06-2014 Through 07-06-2014",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Online learning

T2 - 8th World Research Congress of the European Association for Palliative Care

AU - Hughes, Sean

AU - Preston, Nancy

AU - Payne, Sheila

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - BackgroundA study of patient-centered integrated palliative care pathways in advanced cancer and chronic disease, InSup-C (EC FP7 funded) plans to develop online learning modules to disseminate and promote best practice in this field across Europe. AimsTo identify the key components of effective online learning models in higher and professional development education with particular reference to palliative and end of life care contexts.MethodsA search was conducted for papers that reported peer reviewed studies using MEDLINE, ERIC, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO and Academic Search Complete databases. The main subject term: online learning, was used in combination with evaluat*, research, palliative, and end of life as free text terms. This yielded 1441 results. Further filtering and removing duplicates reduced this to 1084 of which 26 papers were selected for narrative review. Of these, four studies evaluated purely online (un-moderated, asynchronous) learning inputs, 10 were reviews or meta-analyses, and 12 considered online components of blended learning courses.FindingsEvidence for the effectiveness of un-moderated learning was equivocal and where part of a blended approach, confounded by other factors such as tutor input or peer interaction. Reported positive effects included improved access for remote learners and those with resource constraints, and increased flexibility for those studying alongside work commitments. ConclusionsPublished results of evaluative research into purely un-moderated, online educative tools were relatively few. There is a need for better research into the efficacy of these approaches given that there is evidence of their increasing use in palliative and end of life care education. In designing new material for its project, InSup-C will incorporate robust evaluative techniques at the module design stage.

AB - BackgroundA study of patient-centered integrated palliative care pathways in advanced cancer and chronic disease, InSup-C (EC FP7 funded) plans to develop online learning modules to disseminate and promote best practice in this field across Europe. AimsTo identify the key components of effective online learning models in higher and professional development education with particular reference to palliative and end of life care contexts.MethodsA search was conducted for papers that reported peer reviewed studies using MEDLINE, ERIC, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO and Academic Search Complete databases. The main subject term: online learning, was used in combination with evaluat*, research, palliative, and end of life as free text terms. This yielded 1441 results. Further filtering and removing duplicates reduced this to 1084 of which 26 papers were selected for narrative review. Of these, four studies evaluated purely online (un-moderated, asynchronous) learning inputs, 10 were reviews or meta-analyses, and 12 considered online components of blended learning courses.FindingsEvidence for the effectiveness of un-moderated learning was equivocal and where part of a blended approach, confounded by other factors such as tutor input or peer interaction. Reported positive effects included improved access for remote learners and those with resource constraints, and increased flexibility for those studying alongside work commitments. ConclusionsPublished results of evaluative research into purely un-moderated, online educative tools were relatively few. There is a need for better research into the efficacy of these approaches given that there is evidence of their increasing use in palliative and end of life care education. In designing new material for its project, InSup-C will incorporate robust evaluative techniques at the module design stage.

U2 - 10.1177/0269216314532748

DO - 10.1177/0269216314532748

M3 - Meeting abstract

VL - 28

SP - 831

EP - 832

JO - Palliative Medicine

JF - Palliative Medicine

SN - 0269-2163

IS - 6

Y2 - 5 June 2014 through 7 June 2014

ER -