Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Paradoxical family practices

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Paradoxical family practices: LGBTQ+ young people, mental health and wellbeing

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Paradoxical family practices: LGBTQ+ young people, mental health and wellbeing. / Gabb, Jacqui; McDermott, Elizabeth; Eastham, Rachael et al.
In: Journal of Sociology, Vol. 56, No. 4, 12.2020, p. 535-553.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Gabb J, McDermott E, Eastham R, Hanbury A. Paradoxical family practices: LGBTQ+ young people, mental health and wellbeing. Journal of Sociology. 2020 Dec;56(4):535-553. Epub 2019 Nov 20. doi: 10.1177/1440783319888286

Author

Gabb, Jacqui ; McDermott, Elizabeth ; Eastham, Rachael et al. / Paradoxical family practices : LGBTQ+ young people, mental health and wellbeing. In: Journal of Sociology. 2020 ; Vol. 56, No. 4. pp. 535-553.

Bibtex

@article{0c216412ff914f718f6534128ee64c4b,
title = "Paradoxical family practices: LGBTQ+ young people, mental health and wellbeing",
abstract = "This article will explore how LGBTQ+ young people sustain, and in some cases survive, family relationships. We develop the concept of {\textquoteleft}paradoxical family practices{\textquoteright} and use this to demonstrate the ways in which LGBTQ+ young people manage family life through everyday emotion work. This highlights: (1) how families ordinarily navigate heteronormativity and {\textquoteleft}issues{\textquoteright} of gender/sexuality; (2) the efficacy of {\textquoteleft}paradoxical family practices{\textquoteright} as a conceptual tool; (3) the value of emotion-centred multiple qualitative methods to explore the lives of LGBTQ+ young people and mental health. Findings derive from a small-scale UK study funded by the Wellcome Trust (UNS39780) and were generated through a two-stage methodology comprising digital/paper emotion maps and qualitative interviews with LGBTQ+ young people aged 16–25 (n = 12) followed by diary methods and follow-up interviews (n = 9). Interviews were also completed with {\textquoteleft}family members{\textquoteright} (n = 7).",
author = "Jacqui Gabb and Elizabeth McDermott and Rachael Eastham and Ali Hanbury",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1177/1440783319888286",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "535--553",
journal = "Journal of Sociology",
issn = "1440-7833",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradoxical family practices

T2 - LGBTQ+ young people, mental health and wellbeing

AU - Gabb, Jacqui

AU - McDermott, Elizabeth

AU - Eastham, Rachael

AU - Hanbury, Ali

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - This article will explore how LGBTQ+ young people sustain, and in some cases survive, family relationships. We develop the concept of ‘paradoxical family practices’ and use this to demonstrate the ways in which LGBTQ+ young people manage family life through everyday emotion work. This highlights: (1) how families ordinarily navigate heteronormativity and ‘issues’ of gender/sexuality; (2) the efficacy of ‘paradoxical family practices’ as a conceptual tool; (3) the value of emotion-centred multiple qualitative methods to explore the lives of LGBTQ+ young people and mental health. Findings derive from a small-scale UK study funded by the Wellcome Trust (UNS39780) and were generated through a two-stage methodology comprising digital/paper emotion maps and qualitative interviews with LGBTQ+ young people aged 16–25 (n = 12) followed by diary methods and follow-up interviews (n = 9). Interviews were also completed with ‘family members’ (n = 7).

AB - This article will explore how LGBTQ+ young people sustain, and in some cases survive, family relationships. We develop the concept of ‘paradoxical family practices’ and use this to demonstrate the ways in which LGBTQ+ young people manage family life through everyday emotion work. This highlights: (1) how families ordinarily navigate heteronormativity and ‘issues’ of gender/sexuality; (2) the efficacy of ‘paradoxical family practices’ as a conceptual tool; (3) the value of emotion-centred multiple qualitative methods to explore the lives of LGBTQ+ young people and mental health. Findings derive from a small-scale UK study funded by the Wellcome Trust (UNS39780) and were generated through a two-stage methodology comprising digital/paper emotion maps and qualitative interviews with LGBTQ+ young people aged 16–25 (n = 12) followed by diary methods and follow-up interviews (n = 9). Interviews were also completed with ‘family members’ (n = 7).

U2 - 10.1177/1440783319888286

DO - 10.1177/1440783319888286

M3 - Journal article

VL - 56

SP - 535

EP - 553

JO - Journal of Sociology

JF - Journal of Sociology

SN - 1440-7833

IS - 4

ER -