Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Practice Makes Perfect?

Electronic data

  • Practicemakesperfectsubmitminusacknowledgements

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Human Relations, 71(10), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Human Relations page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/HUM on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 535 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Practice Makes Perfect?: Skillful Performance in Veterinary Work, Human Relations

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/10/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Human Relations
Issue number10
Volume71
Number of pages27
Pages (from-to)1395-1421
Publication statusPublished
Early online date24/04/18
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Is vetting a craft that must be learned owing to the limitations of scientific discipline, or simply a question of practice makes perfect? This question arose from our empirical research on veterinary surgeons (vets), who we found were often struggling with the divergence between the precise and unambiguous knowledge underlying the training and the unpredictability and imprecision of their everyday practices. These are comparatively underexplored issues insofar as the literature on vets tends to be descriptive and statistical, focusing primarily on clinical matters and associated human-animal interactions. Our cliché title has a question mark because while many vets remain embedded in the disciplined ‘certainties’ and causal regularities within their training, in practice this ordered world is rarely realized, and they are faced with indeterminacy where the ‘perfect’ solution eludes them. Vets often turn these unrealistic ideals of expertise back in on themselves, thus generating doubt and insecurity for any failure in their practices. In analysing vets’ experiences, we pay attention to the anatomical models of science, where linear causal analysis is expected to provide orderly and predictable outcomes or ‘right’ answers to problems, as well as notions of expertise that turn out to be illusory.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Human Relations, 71(10), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Human Relations page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/HUM on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/