12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Rich contexts do not always enrich the accuracy...
View graph of relations

« Back

Rich contexts do not always enrich the accuracy of personality judgements

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Associated organisational unit

Journal publication date11/2013
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Journal number6
Volume49
Number of pages6
Pages1190-1195
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

We test the common assumption that information ‘rich’ contexts lead to more accurate personality judgments than information ‘lean’ contexts. Pairs of unacquainted students rendered judgments of one another's personalities after interacting in one of three, increasingly rich, contexts: Internet ‘chat’, telephone, or face-to-face. Accuracy was assessed by correlating participants' judgments with a measure of targets' personalities that averaged self and informant ratings. As predicted, the visible traits of extraversion and conscientiousness were judged more accurately than the less visible traits of neuroticism and openness. However, judgment accuracy also depended on context. Judgments of extraversion and neuroticism improved as context richness increased (i.e., from Internet ‘chat’ to face-to-face), whereas judgments of conscientiousness and openness improved as context richness decreased (i.e., from face-to-face to Internet ‘chat’). Our findings suggest that context richness shapes not only the availability of personality cues but also the relevance of cues in any given context.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (6), 2013, © ELSEVIER.