Accepted author manuscript, 132 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY
Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Conference paper
Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Conference paper
}
TY - CONF
T1 - The "context" for smallholder farming is a political ecology of agrarian change
AU - Batterbury, Simon
PY - 2017/7/12
Y1 - 2017/7/12
N2 - Keynote II argued that the “context” for smallholder farming has a significant effect on livelihood outcomes and the success of technological interventions. “Context” includes adaptive skill, and a wide set of constraints. African farmers are quite capable of managing their own genetic resources, innovating, finding markets and diversifying livelihood systems in the absence of severe structural constraints, as Paul Richards, Mike Mortimore, Robert Netting and others have argued. But the “constraints” operating in African and Asian farming systems have been magnified in recent decades by large scale land acquisitions, conflicts over land tenure, city growth, environmental challenges and displacement through civil war and rebel groups. Responding to these problems is a necessary precursor to achieving any widespread success through external technical interventions; food security and ‘Climate Smart Agriculture’ first involves recognising, understanding and tackling different forms of vulnerability, and the role of states, corporations and elites in creating it. I develop some ideas about how to do so, based on studies in Timor Leste, Niger, Cameroon and Burkina Faso.
AB - Keynote II argued that the “context” for smallholder farming has a significant effect on livelihood outcomes and the success of technological interventions. “Context” includes adaptive skill, and a wide set of constraints. African farmers are quite capable of managing their own genetic resources, innovating, finding markets and diversifying livelihood systems in the absence of severe structural constraints, as Paul Richards, Mike Mortimore, Robert Netting and others have argued. But the “constraints” operating in African and Asian farming systems have been magnified in recent decades by large scale land acquisitions, conflicts over land tenure, city growth, environmental challenges and displacement through civil war and rebel groups. Responding to these problems is a necessary precursor to achieving any widespread success through external technical interventions; food security and ‘Climate Smart Agriculture’ first involves recognising, understanding and tackling different forms of vulnerability, and the role of states, corporations and elites in creating it. I develop some ideas about how to do so, based on studies in Timor Leste, Niger, Cameroon and Burkina Faso.
KW - political ecology
KW - agrifood
KW - technography
M3 - Conference paper
T2 - N8 AgriFood 2017 International Sustainable Food Production Conference
Y2 - 11 July 2017 through 13 July 2017
ER -