Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The future of resilient supply chains

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The future of resilient supply chains

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

The future of resilient supply chains. / Donadoni, Mattia; Roden, Sinead; Scholten, Kirstin et al.
Revisiting supply chain risk. ed. / George A. Zsidisin; Michael Henke. Cham: Springer, 2019. p. 169-186 (Springer Series in Supply Chain Management; Vol. 7).

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Donadoni, M, Roden, S, Scholten, K, Stevenson, M, Caniato, F, van Donk, DP & Wieland, A 2019, The future of resilient supply chains. in GA Zsidisin & M Henke (eds), Revisiting supply chain risk. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 7, Springer, Cham, pp. 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_10

APA

Donadoni, M., Roden, S., Scholten, K., Stevenson, M., Caniato, F., van Donk, D. P., & Wieland, A. (2019). The future of resilient supply chains. In G. A. Zsidisin, & M. Henke (Eds.), Revisiting supply chain risk (pp. 169-186). (Springer Series in Supply Chain Management; Vol. 7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_10

Vancouver

Donadoni M, Roden S, Scholten K, Stevenson M, Caniato F, van Donk DP et al. The future of resilient supply chains. In Zsidisin GA, Henke M, editors, Revisiting supply chain risk. Cham: Springer. 2019. p. 169-186. (Springer Series in Supply Chain Management). Epub 2018 Dec 19. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_10

Author

Donadoni, Mattia ; Roden, Sinead ; Scholten, Kirstin et al. / The future of resilient supply chains. Revisiting supply chain risk. editor / George A. Zsidisin ; Michael Henke. Cham : Springer, 2019. pp. 169-186 (Springer Series in Supply Chain Management).

Bibtex

@inbook{c44745adaaa54315bd23032ba4844d09,
title = "The future of resilient supply chains",
abstract = "While supply chain resilience has been touched upon frequently, research remains (with the exception of often repeated anecdotal examples) relatively disparate on what disruptions actually are. This research aims to advance theoretical and managerial understandings around the management of supply chain disruptions. A two-stage research process is used which focuses first on polling academic experts. This stage is followed by the extraction of insights from practitioners in the automotive, electronics and food industries. Our findings coalesce around: (1) the types of disruptions that respondents are most concerned about; (2) the associated strategies suggested to cope with disruptions; and, (3) how resilience can be measured. It is apparent that there are some areas where academics and practitioners agree and others where they agree to a lesser extent. Both sets of actors tend to agree on how resilience can be quantified, with recovery time the preferred indicator. However, there is a discrepancy around how resilience is achieved within the supply chain. Academics emphasise the importance of redundancy while practitioners refer more to flexibility. Also, they disagree around what constitutes “key disruptions”: academics suggested high-profile events, while practitioners are more concerned with day-to-day problems.",
keywords = "Supply chain resilience, Expert interviews, Disruption",
author = "Mattia Donadoni and Sinead Roden and Kirstin Scholten and Mark Stevenson and Federico Caniato and {van Donk}, {Dirk Pieter} and Andreas Wieland",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_10",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783030038120",
series = "Springer Series in Supply Chain Management",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "169--186",
editor = "Zsidisin, {George A.} and Michael Henke",
booktitle = "Revisiting supply chain risk",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - The future of resilient supply chains

AU - Donadoni, Mattia

AU - Roden, Sinead

AU - Scholten, Kirstin

AU - Stevenson, Mark

AU - Caniato, Federico

AU - van Donk, Dirk Pieter

AU - Wieland, Andreas

PY - 2019/1/3

Y1 - 2019/1/3

N2 - While supply chain resilience has been touched upon frequently, research remains (with the exception of often repeated anecdotal examples) relatively disparate on what disruptions actually are. This research aims to advance theoretical and managerial understandings around the management of supply chain disruptions. A two-stage research process is used which focuses first on polling academic experts. This stage is followed by the extraction of insights from practitioners in the automotive, electronics and food industries. Our findings coalesce around: (1) the types of disruptions that respondents are most concerned about; (2) the associated strategies suggested to cope with disruptions; and, (3) how resilience can be measured. It is apparent that there are some areas where academics and practitioners agree and others where they agree to a lesser extent. Both sets of actors tend to agree on how resilience can be quantified, with recovery time the preferred indicator. However, there is a discrepancy around how resilience is achieved within the supply chain. Academics emphasise the importance of redundancy while practitioners refer more to flexibility. Also, they disagree around what constitutes “key disruptions”: academics suggested high-profile events, while practitioners are more concerned with day-to-day problems.

AB - While supply chain resilience has been touched upon frequently, research remains (with the exception of often repeated anecdotal examples) relatively disparate on what disruptions actually are. This research aims to advance theoretical and managerial understandings around the management of supply chain disruptions. A two-stage research process is used which focuses first on polling academic experts. This stage is followed by the extraction of insights from practitioners in the automotive, electronics and food industries. Our findings coalesce around: (1) the types of disruptions that respondents are most concerned about; (2) the associated strategies suggested to cope with disruptions; and, (3) how resilience can be measured. It is apparent that there are some areas where academics and practitioners agree and others where they agree to a lesser extent. Both sets of actors tend to agree on how resilience can be quantified, with recovery time the preferred indicator. However, there is a discrepancy around how resilience is achieved within the supply chain. Academics emphasise the importance of redundancy while practitioners refer more to flexibility. Also, they disagree around what constitutes “key disruptions”: academics suggested high-profile events, while practitioners are more concerned with day-to-day problems.

KW - Supply chain resilience

KW - Expert interviews

KW - Disruption

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_10

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_10

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783030038120

T3 - Springer Series in Supply Chain Management

SP - 169

EP - 186

BT - Revisiting supply chain risk

A2 - Zsidisin, George A.

A2 - Henke, Michael

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

ER -