Rights statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02686-8_11
Accepted author manuscript, 881 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - The IoT and Unpacking the Heffalump’s Trunk
AU - Lindley, Joseph Galen
AU - Coulton, Paul
AU - Cooper, Rachel
N1 - The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02686-8_11
PY - 2018/11/16
Y1 - 2018/11/16
N2 - In this paper we highlight design challenges that the Internet of Things (IoT) poses in relation to two of the guiding design paradigms of our time; Privacy by Design (PbD) and Human Centered Design (HCD). The terms IoT, PbD, and HCD are both suitcase terms, meaning that they have a variety of meanings packed within them. Depending on how the practices behind the terms are applied, notwithstanding their well-considered foundations, intentions, and theory, we explore how PbD and HCD can, if not considered carefully, become Heffalump traps and hence act in opposition to the very challenges they seek to address. In response to this assertion we introduce Object Oriented Ontology (OOO) and experiment with its theoretical framing order to articulate possible strategies for mitigating these challenges when designing for the Internet of Things.
AB - In this paper we highlight design challenges that the Internet of Things (IoT) poses in relation to two of the guiding design paradigms of our time; Privacy by Design (PbD) and Human Centered Design (HCD). The terms IoT, PbD, and HCD are both suitcase terms, meaning that they have a variety of meanings packed within them. Depending on how the practices behind the terms are applied, notwithstanding their well-considered foundations, intentions, and theory, we explore how PbD and HCD can, if not considered carefully, become Heffalump traps and hence act in opposition to the very challenges they seek to address. In response to this assertion we introduce Object Oriented Ontology (OOO) and experiment with its theoretical framing order to articulate possible strategies for mitigating these challenges when designing for the Internet of Things.
KW - Internet of Things
KW - Privacy by Design
KW - Human Centered Design
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-02686-8_11
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-02686-8_11
M3 - Conference contribution/Paper
SN - 9783030026851
VL - 880
SP - 134
EP - 151
BT - Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2018
A2 - Arai, K
A2 - Bhatia, R
A2 - Kapoor, S
PB - Springer
CY - Cham
T2 - Future Technologies Conference 2018
Y2 - 13 November 2018 through 14 November 2018
ER -