Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Poster › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Poster › peer-review
}
TY - CONF
T1 - Two years down, one to go
T2 - Cochrane Colloquium
AU - Kew, Kayleigh
AU - Normansell, Rebecca
AU - Milan, Stephen James
PY - 2016/10/24
Y1 - 2016/10/24
N2 - BackgroundThere is more emphasis than ever on producing priority systematic reviews to a highstandard as quickly as possible. This is a key element of Cochrane’s Strategy to 2020, andthe focus of Production Models within Project Transform – Cochrane’s initiative to “improvethe way people, processes, and technologies come together to produce Cochrane content”.Cochrane Airways started a three-year NIHR programme grant in May 2014 on the subject ofasthma. We presented reassuring progress at the end of year 1 in Vienna, and listed aspectsthat sped up or slowed down development. Another year on and with a year to go, we haveupdated and extended the analyses.ObjectiveTo assess an NIHR programme grant as a production model in terms of productivity,authorship, resources, and impact.MethodsWe used Archie data to track the 25 programme grant titles and conduct analyses of mediantime taken to reach milestones. We collated data about PPI involvement, number andgeography of contributing authors, resources, and impact (guideline inclusion, Altmetrics,podcasts and blogs).ConclusionsThe model continues to be an efficient way of producing priority reviews quickly in the Airwaysgroup. Resource implications may be a barrier to implementing the model more widely, andimprovements are needed to enhance impact and inclusion, especially from authors in LMIC.
AB - BackgroundThere is more emphasis than ever on producing priority systematic reviews to a highstandard as quickly as possible. This is a key element of Cochrane’s Strategy to 2020, andthe focus of Production Models within Project Transform – Cochrane’s initiative to “improvethe way people, processes, and technologies come together to produce Cochrane content”.Cochrane Airways started a three-year NIHR programme grant in May 2014 on the subject ofasthma. We presented reassuring progress at the end of year 1 in Vienna, and listed aspectsthat sped up or slowed down development. Another year on and with a year to go, we haveupdated and extended the analyses.ObjectiveTo assess an NIHR programme grant as a production model in terms of productivity,authorship, resources, and impact.MethodsWe used Archie data to track the 25 programme grant titles and conduct analyses of mediantime taken to reach milestones. We collated data about PPI involvement, number andgeography of contributing authors, resources, and impact (guideline inclusion, Altmetrics,podcasts and blogs).ConclusionsThe model continues to be an efficient way of producing priority reviews quickly in the Airwaysgroup. Resource implications may be a barrier to implementing the model more widely, andimprovements are needed to enhance impact and inclusion, especially from authors in LMIC.
M3 - Poster
Y2 - 24 October 2016 through 27 October 2016
ER -