Home > Research > Researchers > Dr Gemma Derrick > Publications

Research

Dr Gemma Derrick

Formerly at Lancaster University

31 - 40 out of 44Page size: 10
RSS feed of this list
  1. 2013
  2. Published

    The role of research incentives in medical research organisations

    Derrick, G. E. & Bryant, C., 01/2013, In: R and D Management. 43, 1, p. 75-86 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

  3. Published

    "A number you just can’t get away from”: Characteristics of Adoption and the Social Construction of Metric Use by Researchers

    Derrick, G. E. & Gillespie, J., 2013, Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavour: Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin. . Hinze, S. & Lottmann, A. (eds.). Berlin, Germany, p. 104-116 13 p. (Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor).

    Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review

  4. Published

    Are citations a complete measure for the impact of e-research infrastructures

    Jonkers, K., Derrick, G. E., Lopez-Illescas, C. & Van den Besselaar, P., 2013, Proceedings of ISSI 2013 Vienna: 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference . Gorraiz, J., Schiebel, E., Gumpenberger, C., Hörlesberger, M. & Moed, H. (eds.). Vienna: AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, p. 136-151 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review

  5. 2012
  6. Published

    A bibliometric analysis of research on Indigenous health in Australia, 1972-2008

    Derrick, G. E., Hayen, A., Chapman, S., Haynes, A. S., Webster, B. M. & Anderson, I., 06/2012, In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 36, 3, p. 269-273 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

  7. Published

    The bibliometric bandwagon: characteristics of bibliometric articles outside the field literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (vol 63, pg 829, 2012)

    Jonkers, K. & Derrick, G. E., 06/2012, In: Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63, 6, p. 1280-1280 1 p.

    Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

  8. Published

    The bibliometric bandwagon: characteristics of bibliometric articles outside the field literature

    Jonkers, K. & Derrick, G. E., 04/2012, In: Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63, 4, p. 829-836 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

  9. Published

    Identifying trustworthy experts: how do policymakers find and assess public health researchers worth consulting or collaborating with?

    Haynes, A. S., Derrick, G. E., Redman, S., Hall, W. D., Gillespie, J. A., Chapman, S. & Sturk, H., 5/03/2012, In: PLoS ONE. 7, 3, 8 p., 32665.

    Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

  10. Published

    Bibliographic analysis of papers and authors published in Tobacco Control 1998-August 2011.

    Chapman, S. & Derrick, G. E., 03/2012, In: Tobacco Control. 21, p. 198-201 4 p.

    Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

  11. 2011
  12. Published

    Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers

    Haynes, A. S., Gillespie, J. A., Derrick, G. E., Hall, W. D., Redman, S., Chapman, S. & Sturk, H., 12/2011, In: Milbank Quarterly. 89, 4, p. 564-598 35 p.

    Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

  13. Published

    Democratising assessment of researchers' track records: a simple proposal

    Chapman, S., Derrick, G. E., Haynes, A. S. & Hall, W. D., 1/08/2011, In: Medical journal of australia. 195, 3, p. 147-148 2 p.

    Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Editorial › peer-review

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

Back to top