Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > 24-Karat or fool’s gold?


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

24-Karat or fool’s gold?: Consequences of real team and co-acting group membership in healthcare organizations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

<mark>Journal publication date</mark>2015
<mark>Journal</mark>European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Issue number6
Number of pages22
Pages (from-to)929-950
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date23/12/14
<mark>Original language</mark>English


Although theory on team membership is emerging, limited empirical attention has been paid to the effects of different types of eam membership on outcomes. We propose that an important but overlooked distinction is that between membership of real eams and membership of co-acting groups, with the former being characterized by members who report that their teams have shared objectives, and structural interdependence and engage in team reflexivity. We hypothesize that real team membership will be associated with more positive individual- and organizational-level outcomes.
These predictions were tested in the English National Health Service, using data from 62,733 respondents from 147 acute hospitals. The results revealed that ndividuals reporting the characteristics of real team membership, in comparison with those reporting the characteristics of co- acting group membership, witnessed fewer errors and incidents, experienced fewer work related
injuries and illness, were less ikely to be victims of violence and harassment, and were less likely to intend to leave their current employment. At the organizational level, hospitals with higher proportions of staff reporting the characteristics of real team membership had lower levels of patient mortality and sickness absence. The results suggest the need to clearly delineate real
team membership in order o advance scientific understanding of the processes and outcomes of organizational teamwork.