Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A brief review on algorithmic fairness

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A brief review on algorithmic fairness

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A brief review on algorithmic fairness. / Wang, Xiaomeng; Zhang, Yishi; Zhu, Ruilin.
In: Management System Engineering, Vol. 1, 7, 10.11.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

Wang, X, Zhang, Y & Zhu, R 2022, 'A brief review on algorithmic fairness', Management System Engineering, vol. 1, 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44176-022-00006-z

APA

Wang, X., Zhang, Y., & Zhu, R. (2022). A brief review on algorithmic fairness. Management System Engineering, 1, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44176-022-00006-z

Vancouver

Wang X, Zhang Y, Zhu R. A brief review on algorithmic fairness. Management System Engineering. 2022 Nov 10;1:7. doi: 10.1007/s44176-022-00006-z

Author

Wang, Xiaomeng ; Zhang, Yishi ; Zhu, Ruilin. / A brief review on algorithmic fairness. In: Management System Engineering. 2022 ; Vol. 1.

Bibtex

@article{4c8ac583c70b460f839145d41274f313,
title = "A brief review on algorithmic fairness",
abstract = "Machine learning algorithms are widely used in management systems in different fields, such as employee recruitment, loan provision, disease diagnosis, etc., and even in some risky decision-making areas, playing an increasingly crucial role in decisions affecting people{\textquoteright}s lives and social development. However, the use of algorithms for automated decision-making can cause unintentional biases that lead to discrimination against certain specific groups. In this context, it is crucial to develop machine learning algorithms that are not only accurate but also fair. There is an extensive discussion of algorithmic fairness in the existing literature. Many scholars have proposed and tested definitions of fairness and attempted to address the problem of unfairness or discrimination in algorithms. This review aims to outline different definitions of algorithmic fairness and to introduce the procedure for constructing fair algorithms to enhance fairness in machine learning. First, this review divides the definitions of algorithmic fairness into two categories, namely, awareness-based fairness and rationality-based fairness, and discusses existing representative algorithmic fairness concepts and notions based on the two categories. Then, metrics for unfairness/discrimination identification are summarized and different unfairness/discrimination removal approaches are discussed to facilitate a better understanding of how algorithmic fairness can be implemented in different scenarios. Challenges and future research directions in the field of algorithmic fairness are finally concluded.",
keywords = "Review Article, Algorithmic fairness, Fairness definition, Fairness identification, Unfairness removal, Causal inference",
author = "Xiaomeng Wang and Yishi Zhang and Ruilin Zhu",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s44176-022-00006-z",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
journal = "Management System Engineering",
issn = "2731-5843",
publisher = "Springer Nature Singapore",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A brief review on algorithmic fairness

AU - Wang, Xiaomeng

AU - Zhang, Yishi

AU - Zhu, Ruilin

PY - 2022/11/10

Y1 - 2022/11/10

N2 - Machine learning algorithms are widely used in management systems in different fields, such as employee recruitment, loan provision, disease diagnosis, etc., and even in some risky decision-making areas, playing an increasingly crucial role in decisions affecting people’s lives and social development. However, the use of algorithms for automated decision-making can cause unintentional biases that lead to discrimination against certain specific groups. In this context, it is crucial to develop machine learning algorithms that are not only accurate but also fair. There is an extensive discussion of algorithmic fairness in the existing literature. Many scholars have proposed and tested definitions of fairness and attempted to address the problem of unfairness or discrimination in algorithms. This review aims to outline different definitions of algorithmic fairness and to introduce the procedure for constructing fair algorithms to enhance fairness in machine learning. First, this review divides the definitions of algorithmic fairness into two categories, namely, awareness-based fairness and rationality-based fairness, and discusses existing representative algorithmic fairness concepts and notions based on the two categories. Then, metrics for unfairness/discrimination identification are summarized and different unfairness/discrimination removal approaches are discussed to facilitate a better understanding of how algorithmic fairness can be implemented in different scenarios. Challenges and future research directions in the field of algorithmic fairness are finally concluded.

AB - Machine learning algorithms are widely used in management systems in different fields, such as employee recruitment, loan provision, disease diagnosis, etc., and even in some risky decision-making areas, playing an increasingly crucial role in decisions affecting people’s lives and social development. However, the use of algorithms for automated decision-making can cause unintentional biases that lead to discrimination against certain specific groups. In this context, it is crucial to develop machine learning algorithms that are not only accurate but also fair. There is an extensive discussion of algorithmic fairness in the existing literature. Many scholars have proposed and tested definitions of fairness and attempted to address the problem of unfairness or discrimination in algorithms. This review aims to outline different definitions of algorithmic fairness and to introduce the procedure for constructing fair algorithms to enhance fairness in machine learning. First, this review divides the definitions of algorithmic fairness into two categories, namely, awareness-based fairness and rationality-based fairness, and discusses existing representative algorithmic fairness concepts and notions based on the two categories. Then, metrics for unfairness/discrimination identification are summarized and different unfairness/discrimination removal approaches are discussed to facilitate a better understanding of how algorithmic fairness can be implemented in different scenarios. Challenges and future research directions in the field of algorithmic fairness are finally concluded.

KW - Review Article

KW - Algorithmic fairness

KW - Fairness definition

KW - Fairness identification

KW - Unfairness removal

KW - Causal inference

U2 - 10.1007/s44176-022-00006-z

DO - 10.1007/s44176-022-00006-z

M3 - Review article

VL - 1

JO - Management System Engineering

JF - Management System Engineering

SN - 2731-5843

M1 - 7

ER -