Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A changing role for transitional probabilities ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A changing role for transitional probabilities in word learning during the transition to toddlerhood?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A changing role for transitional probabilities in word learning during the transition to toddlerhood? / Lany, Jill; Karaman, Ferhat; Hay, Jessica F.
In: Developmental Psychology, Vol. 60, No. 3, 31.03.2024, p. 567-581.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lany J, Karaman F, Hay JF. A changing role for transitional probabilities in word learning during the transition to toddlerhood? Developmental Psychology. 2024 Mar 31;60(3):567-581. Epub 2024 Jan 25. doi: 10.1037/dev0001641

Author

Lany, Jill ; Karaman, Ferhat ; Hay, Jessica F. / A changing role for transitional probabilities in word learning during the transition to toddlerhood?. In: Developmental Psychology. 2024 ; Vol. 60, No. 3. pp. 567-581.

Bibtex

@article{fece1bf1b18848c38f7b176759da03a4,
title = "A changing role for transitional probabilities in word learning during the transition to toddlerhood?",
abstract = "Infants{\textquoteright} sensitivity to transitional probabilities (TPs) supports language development by facilitating mapping high-TP (HTP) words tomeaning, at least up to 18 months of age. Here we tested whether this HTP advantage holds as lexical development progresses, and infants become better at forming word–referent mappings. Two groups of 24-month-olds (N = 64 and all White, tested in the United States) first listened to Italian sentences containing HTP and low-TP (LTP) words. We then used HTP and LTP words, and sequences that violated these statistics, in a mapping task. Infants learned HTP and LTP words equally well. They also learned LTP violations as well as LTP words, but learned HTP words better than HTP violations. Thus, by 2 years of age sensitivity to TPs does not lead to an HTP advantage but rather to poor mapping of violations of HTP word forms.",
author = "Jill Lany and Ferhat Karaman and Hay, {Jessica F.}",
year = "2024",
month = mar,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1037/dev0001641",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "567--581",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A changing role for transitional probabilities in word learning during the transition to toddlerhood?

AU - Lany, Jill

AU - Karaman, Ferhat

AU - Hay, Jessica F.

PY - 2024/3/31

Y1 - 2024/3/31

N2 - Infants’ sensitivity to transitional probabilities (TPs) supports language development by facilitating mapping high-TP (HTP) words tomeaning, at least up to 18 months of age. Here we tested whether this HTP advantage holds as lexical development progresses, and infants become better at forming word–referent mappings. Two groups of 24-month-olds (N = 64 and all White, tested in the United States) first listened to Italian sentences containing HTP and low-TP (LTP) words. We then used HTP and LTP words, and sequences that violated these statistics, in a mapping task. Infants learned HTP and LTP words equally well. They also learned LTP violations as well as LTP words, but learned HTP words better than HTP violations. Thus, by 2 years of age sensitivity to TPs does not lead to an HTP advantage but rather to poor mapping of violations of HTP word forms.

AB - Infants’ sensitivity to transitional probabilities (TPs) supports language development by facilitating mapping high-TP (HTP) words tomeaning, at least up to 18 months of age. Here we tested whether this HTP advantage holds as lexical development progresses, and infants become better at forming word–referent mappings. Two groups of 24-month-olds (N = 64 and all White, tested in the United States) first listened to Italian sentences containing HTP and low-TP (LTP) words. We then used HTP and LTP words, and sequences that violated these statistics, in a mapping task. Infants learned HTP and LTP words equally well. They also learned LTP violations as well as LTP words, but learned HTP words better than HTP violations. Thus, by 2 years of age sensitivity to TPs does not lead to an HTP advantage but rather to poor mapping of violations of HTP word forms.

U2 - 10.1037/dev0001641

DO - 10.1037/dev0001641

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38271022

VL - 60

SP - 567

EP - 581

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 3

ER -