Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A comparative analysis of China and India’s man...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

A comparative analysis of China and India’s manufacturing sectors

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

A comparative analysis of China and India’s manufacturing sectors. / Wei, Yingqi; Balasubramanyam, Vudayagi.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2015. (Economics Working Paper Series; Vol. 2015, No. 3).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Wei, Y & Balasubramanyam, V 2015 'A comparative analysis of China and India’s manufacturing sectors' Economics Working Paper Series, no. 3, vol. 2015, Lancaster University, Department of Economics, Lancaster.

APA

Wei, Y., & Balasubramanyam, V. (2015). A comparative analysis of China and India’s manufacturing sectors. (Economics Working Paper Series; Vol. 2015, No. 3). Lancaster University, Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Wei Y, Balasubramanyam V. A comparative analysis of China and India’s manufacturing sectors. Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics. 2015. (Economics Working Paper Series; 3).

Author

Wei, Yingqi ; Balasubramanyam, Vudayagi. / A comparative analysis of China and India’s manufacturing sectors. Lancaster : Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2015. (Economics Working Paper Series; 3).

Bibtex

@techreport{68041b4c60284e94baac0dacdc159444,
title = "A comparative analysis of China and India{\textquoteright}s manufacturing sectors",
abstract = "China{\textquoteright}s manufacturing sector led by labour intensive manufactures has grown much faster than that of India both in terms of production and exports. It is often argued that India{\textquoteright}s manufacturing sector that is relatively capital intensive must now follow China{\textquoteright}s example and promote labour intensive manufactures. This is said to be essential if India were to promote growth and employment that are both essential for reducing the relatively high levels of poverty in the country. This paper argues that it may not be feasible for India to follow China{\textquoteright}s growth strategy based on exports of labour intensive manufactures. India may have missed the boat and in any case it has failed to implement a strategy for agriculture of the sort that China put in place to provide its manufacturing sector with low wages and low cost raw materials. India, however, should utilise its services sector, mostly the IT services, to promote its nascent non- farm manufacturing sector in the rural areas. There may be lessons here from China{\textquoteright}s town and village enterprises TVEs) programme.",
keywords = "Manufacturing, Foreign Direct Investment, Labour Regulations, Town and Village Enterprises (TVEs)",
author = "Yingqi Wei and Vudayagi Balasubramanyam",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Paper Series",
publisher = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",
number = "3",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - A comparative analysis of China and India’s manufacturing sectors

AU - Wei, Yingqi

AU - Balasubramanyam, Vudayagi

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - China’s manufacturing sector led by labour intensive manufactures has grown much faster than that of India both in terms of production and exports. It is often argued that India’s manufacturing sector that is relatively capital intensive must now follow China’s example and promote labour intensive manufactures. This is said to be essential if India were to promote growth and employment that are both essential for reducing the relatively high levels of poverty in the country. This paper argues that it may not be feasible for India to follow China’s growth strategy based on exports of labour intensive manufactures. India may have missed the boat and in any case it has failed to implement a strategy for agriculture of the sort that China put in place to provide its manufacturing sector with low wages and low cost raw materials. India, however, should utilise its services sector, mostly the IT services, to promote its nascent non- farm manufacturing sector in the rural areas. There may be lessons here from China’s town and village enterprises TVEs) programme.

AB - China’s manufacturing sector led by labour intensive manufactures has grown much faster than that of India both in terms of production and exports. It is often argued that India’s manufacturing sector that is relatively capital intensive must now follow China’s example and promote labour intensive manufactures. This is said to be essential if India were to promote growth and employment that are both essential for reducing the relatively high levels of poverty in the country. This paper argues that it may not be feasible for India to follow China’s growth strategy based on exports of labour intensive manufactures. India may have missed the boat and in any case it has failed to implement a strategy for agriculture of the sort that China put in place to provide its manufacturing sector with low wages and low cost raw materials. India, however, should utilise its services sector, mostly the IT services, to promote its nascent non- farm manufacturing sector in the rural areas. There may be lessons here from China’s town and village enterprises TVEs) programme.

KW - Manufacturing

KW - Foreign Direct Investment

KW - Labour Regulations

KW - Town and Village Enterprises (TVEs)

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Paper Series

BT - A comparative analysis of China and India’s manufacturing sectors

PB - Lancaster University, Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster

ER -