Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A comparison of video- and audio-mediated liste...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A comparison of video- and audio-mediated listening tests with many-facet Rasch modeling and differential distractor functioning

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A comparison of video- and audio-mediated listening tests with many-facet Rasch modeling and differential distractor functioning. / Batty, Aaron.
In: Language Testing, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.2015, p. 3-20.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Batty A. A comparison of video- and audio-mediated listening tests with many-facet Rasch modeling and differential distractor functioning. Language Testing. 2015 Jan;32(1):3-20. Epub 2014 May 14. doi: 10.1177/0265532214531254

Author

Bibtex

@article{34d15e5c1b19409ba5106e31d14fec15,
title = "A comparison of video- and audio-mediated listening tests with many-facet Rasch modeling and differential distractor functioning",
abstract = "The rise in the affordability of quality video production equipment has resulted in increased interest in video-mediated tests of foreign language listening comprehension. Although research on such tests has continued fairly steadily since the early 1980s, studies have relied on analyses of raw scores, despite the growing prevalence of item response theory in the field of language testing as a whole. The present study addresses this gap by comparing data from identical, counter-balanced multiple-choice listening test forms employing three text types (monologue, conversation, and lecture) administered to 164 university students of English in Japan. Data were analyzed via many-facet Rasch modeling to compare the difficulties of the audio and video formats; to investigate interactions between format and text-type, and format and proficiency level; and to identify specific items biased toward one or the other format. Finally, items displaying such differences were subjected to differential distractor functioning analyses. No interactions between format and text-type, or format and proficiency level, were observed. Four items were discovered displaying format-based differences in difficulty, two of which were found to correspond to possible acting anomalies in the videos. The author argues for further work focusing on item-level interactions with test format.",
keywords = "differential distractor functioning, language assessment, listening assessment, many-facet Rasch measurement , nonverbal communication , video listening test",
author = "Aaron Batty",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1177/0265532214531254",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "3--20",
journal = "Language Testing",
issn = "0265-5322",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of video- and audio-mediated listening tests with many-facet Rasch modeling and differential distractor functioning

AU - Batty, Aaron

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - The rise in the affordability of quality video production equipment has resulted in increased interest in video-mediated tests of foreign language listening comprehension. Although research on such tests has continued fairly steadily since the early 1980s, studies have relied on analyses of raw scores, despite the growing prevalence of item response theory in the field of language testing as a whole. The present study addresses this gap by comparing data from identical, counter-balanced multiple-choice listening test forms employing three text types (monologue, conversation, and lecture) administered to 164 university students of English in Japan. Data were analyzed via many-facet Rasch modeling to compare the difficulties of the audio and video formats; to investigate interactions between format and text-type, and format and proficiency level; and to identify specific items biased toward one or the other format. Finally, items displaying such differences were subjected to differential distractor functioning analyses. No interactions between format and text-type, or format and proficiency level, were observed. Four items were discovered displaying format-based differences in difficulty, two of which were found to correspond to possible acting anomalies in the videos. The author argues for further work focusing on item-level interactions with test format.

AB - The rise in the affordability of quality video production equipment has resulted in increased interest in video-mediated tests of foreign language listening comprehension. Although research on such tests has continued fairly steadily since the early 1980s, studies have relied on analyses of raw scores, despite the growing prevalence of item response theory in the field of language testing as a whole. The present study addresses this gap by comparing data from identical, counter-balanced multiple-choice listening test forms employing three text types (monologue, conversation, and lecture) administered to 164 university students of English in Japan. Data were analyzed via many-facet Rasch modeling to compare the difficulties of the audio and video formats; to investigate interactions between format and text-type, and format and proficiency level; and to identify specific items biased toward one or the other format. Finally, items displaying such differences were subjected to differential distractor functioning analyses. No interactions between format and text-type, or format and proficiency level, were observed. Four items were discovered displaying format-based differences in difficulty, two of which were found to correspond to possible acting anomalies in the videos. The author argues for further work focusing on item-level interactions with test format.

KW - differential distractor functioning

KW - language assessment

KW - listening assessment

KW - many-facet Rasch measurement

KW - nonverbal communication

KW - video listening test

U2 - 10.1177/0265532214531254

DO - 10.1177/0265532214531254

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 3

EP - 20

JO - Language Testing

JF - Language Testing

SN - 0265-5322

IS - 1

ER -