Accepted author manuscript, 662 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A corpus study of conventionalized constructions of impoliteness in Chinese
AU - Hu, Yue
AU - Van Olmen, Daniel
PY - 2025/7/10
Y1 - 2025/7/10
N2 - This corpus-based study investigates the nǐ zhè(ge)/gè + NP constructions in Chinese: nǐ zhège + NP, nǐ zhè + NP and nǐ gè + NP, where nǐ is ‘you’, zhège/zhè a demonstrative phrase and gè a classifier. Drawing on data from the Chinese Web Corpus 2011, we conduct a multiple distinctive collexeme analysis, together with a detailed analysis of co-text, to examine the impolite use of the constructions and their relationships with one another. Our results demonstrate that all three constructions are conventionalized for impoliteness, which contradicts the prevailing view in the literature that (im)politeness is just a matter of context and needs to be evaluated in each situation. Nǐ gè + NP is also shown to differ significantly from the other two constructions in terms of the attracted noun phrases, the proportion of impolite usage, the nature of the impoliteness, and the proportion of address usage. We therefore argue, contrary to some earlier claims, that nǐ gè + NP is an independent construction rather than a reduced form of nǐ zhège + NP. Finally, we examine how the constructions’ components –the second person pronoun, proximal demonstrative, and general classifier– contribute to their impoliteness.
AB - This corpus-based study investigates the nǐ zhè(ge)/gè + NP constructions in Chinese: nǐ zhège + NP, nǐ zhè + NP and nǐ gè + NP, where nǐ is ‘you’, zhège/zhè a demonstrative phrase and gè a classifier. Drawing on data from the Chinese Web Corpus 2011, we conduct a multiple distinctive collexeme analysis, together with a detailed analysis of co-text, to examine the impolite use of the constructions and their relationships with one another. Our results demonstrate that all three constructions are conventionalized for impoliteness, which contradicts the prevailing view in the literature that (im)politeness is just a matter of context and needs to be evaluated in each situation. Nǐ gè + NP is also shown to differ significantly from the other two constructions in terms of the attracted noun phrases, the proportion of impolite usage, the nature of the impoliteness, and the proportion of address usage. We therefore argue, contrary to some earlier claims, that nǐ gè + NP is an independent construction rather than a reduced form of nǐ zhège + NP. Finally, we examine how the constructions’ components –the second person pronoun, proximal demonstrative, and general classifier– contribute to their impoliteness.
U2 - 10.1007/s41701-025-00198-1
DO - 10.1007/s41701-025-00198-1
M3 - Journal article
JO - Corpus Pragmatics
JF - Corpus Pragmatics
SN - 2509-9507
ER -