Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) review ...

Links

View graph of relations

A critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) review of the current evidence base for dementia training in hospitals

Research output: Other contribution

Published

Standard

A critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) review of the current evidence base for dementia training in hospitals. / Ahmed, Faraz; Morbey, Hazel; Harding, Andrew et al.
2018, PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews.

Research output: Other contribution

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@misc{d2b9216cb7a940798455e93854411ba6,
title = "A critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) review of the current evidence base for dementia training in hospitals",
abstract = "Protocol registered in PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. The main aim and our guiding question for our critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) review is to explore what is the evidence base for dementia training in hospitals?Our objective is to gain further understanding about:[a] What are the effects of training at:i. staff level? (e.g., knowledge, confidence, strain, satisfaction in interacting with dementia patients, prescribing behaviour, medicine management);ii. patient and carer level? (e.g., patient experience (reports and ratings of care), including carers experiences, and quality of life, QALYs, adverse events, opportunity costs, clinical outcomes/measures of effectiveness, health status, utility values)iii. organisational level? (e.g., length of hospital stay, elective and non-elective length of stay, emergency readmissions and length of stay, guidelines and resources, cost implication and cost-effectiveness).[b] How are these effects moderated by context, staff groups and policies? What are the mechanisms, barriers and facilitators of dementia-related training in a hospital setting?",
author = "Faraz Ahmed and Hazel Morbey and Andrew Harding and Qian Xiong and Jane Kenyon and Caroline Swarbrick and Ruth Elvish and Simon Burrow and John Keady and Reilly, {Siobhan Theresa}",
year = "2018",
month = feb,
day = "13",
language = "English",
type = "Other",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - A critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) review of the current evidence base for dementia training in hospitals

AU - Ahmed, Faraz

AU - Morbey, Hazel

AU - Harding, Andrew

AU - Xiong, Qian

AU - Kenyon, Jane

AU - Swarbrick, Caroline

AU - Elvish, Ruth

AU - Burrow, Simon

AU - Keady, John

AU - Reilly, Siobhan Theresa

PY - 2018/2/13

Y1 - 2018/2/13

N2 - Protocol registered in PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. The main aim and our guiding question for our critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) review is to explore what is the evidence base for dementia training in hospitals?Our objective is to gain further understanding about:[a] What are the effects of training at:i. staff level? (e.g., knowledge, confidence, strain, satisfaction in interacting with dementia patients, prescribing behaviour, medicine management);ii. patient and carer level? (e.g., patient experience (reports and ratings of care), including carers experiences, and quality of life, QALYs, adverse events, opportunity costs, clinical outcomes/measures of effectiveness, health status, utility values)iii. organisational level? (e.g., length of hospital stay, elective and non-elective length of stay, emergency readmissions and length of stay, guidelines and resources, cost implication and cost-effectiveness).[b] How are these effects moderated by context, staff groups and policies? What are the mechanisms, barriers and facilitators of dementia-related training in a hospital setting?

AB - Protocol registered in PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. The main aim and our guiding question for our critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) review is to explore what is the evidence base for dementia training in hospitals?Our objective is to gain further understanding about:[a] What are the effects of training at:i. staff level? (e.g., knowledge, confidence, strain, satisfaction in interacting with dementia patients, prescribing behaviour, medicine management);ii. patient and carer level? (e.g., patient experience (reports and ratings of care), including carers experiences, and quality of life, QALYs, adverse events, opportunity costs, clinical outcomes/measures of effectiveness, health status, utility values)iii. organisational level? (e.g., length of hospital stay, elective and non-elective length of stay, emergency readmissions and length of stay, guidelines and resources, cost implication and cost-effectiveness).[b] How are these effects moderated by context, staff groups and policies? What are the mechanisms, barriers and facilitators of dementia-related training in a hospital setting?

M3 - Other contribution

ER -