Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A cross-disciplinary toolkit to assess the risk...
View graph of relations

A cross-disciplinary toolkit to assess the risk of faecal indicator loss from grassland farm systems to surface waters.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A cross-disciplinary toolkit to assess the risk of faecal indicator loss from grassland farm systems to surface waters. / Oliver, David M.; Fish, Rob; Hodgson, Chris J. et al.
In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol. 129, No. 4, 02.2009, p. 401-412.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Oliver, DM, Fish, R, Hodgson, CJ, Heathwaite, AL, Chadwick, DR & Winter, M 2009, 'A cross-disciplinary toolkit to assess the risk of faecal indicator loss from grassland farm systems to surface waters.', Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.019

APA

Vancouver

Oliver DM, Fish R, Hodgson CJ, Heathwaite AL, Chadwick DR, Winter M. A cross-disciplinary toolkit to assess the risk of faecal indicator loss from grassland farm systems to surface waters. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2009 Feb;129(4):401-412. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.019

Author

Oliver, David M. ; Fish, Rob ; Hodgson, Chris J. et al. / A cross-disciplinary toolkit to assess the risk of faecal indicator loss from grassland farm systems to surface waters. In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2009 ; Vol. 129, No. 4. pp. 401-412.

Bibtex

@article{21af1a6a41764e92a2d4804995831456,
title = "A cross-disciplinary toolkit to assess the risk of faecal indicator loss from grassland farm systems to surface waters.",
abstract = "Diffuse microbial pollution from agriculture is a key contributor to water quality impairment. Reducing the risk of microbial contamination of watercourses from agricultural sources requires both environmentally appropriate and socially acceptable mitigation and management approaches. A cross-disciplinary toolkit for on-farm microbial risk assessment is presented that can represent both social and environmental factors promoting or preventing the accumulation of faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) within the farm environment, and also their subsequent transfer to watercourses. Four key risk criteria were identified as governing FIO loss from land to water. These were {\textquoteleft}accumulating E. coli burden to land{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}landscape transfer potential{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}infrastructure{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}social and economical obstacles to taking action{\textquoteright}. The toolkit can be used to determine (i) the relative risk of a farm enterprise contributing to microbial watercourse pollution and (ii) appropriate and targeted mitigation to reduce the risk of FIO loss from land to water. A comparison of the toolkit output with microbiological water quality draining from three contrasting grassland farm enterprises provided a preliminary evaluation of the prototype approach. When applied to 31 grassland farm enterprises the toolkit suggested that 0% were categorised as negligible risk, 32% low, 65% medium, 3% high and 0% very high risk. Such qualitative risk-based tools can assist the policy community not only to target high risk areas, but also to develop mitigation strategies that are sensitive to the different ways in which risk is produced. Capacity for long-term cross-disciplinary research is argued to be the means by which these integrated and more sustainable solutions may emerge.",
keywords = "cross-disciplinary, decision support, E. coli, faecal indicators, farm, mitigation, risk, microbial pollution, agriculture, pathogen",
author = "Oliver, {David M.} and Rob Fish and Hodgson, {Chris J.} and Heathwaite, {A. Louise} and Chadwick, {David R.} and Michael Winter",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 129 (4), 2009, {\textcopyright} ELSEVIER.",
year = "2009",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.019",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "401--412",
journal = "Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment",
issn = "0167-8809",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cross-disciplinary toolkit to assess the risk of faecal indicator loss from grassland farm systems to surface waters.

AU - Oliver, David M.

AU - Fish, Rob

AU - Hodgson, Chris J.

AU - Heathwaite, A. Louise

AU - Chadwick, David R.

AU - Winter, Michael

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 129 (4), 2009, © ELSEVIER.

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Diffuse microbial pollution from agriculture is a key contributor to water quality impairment. Reducing the risk of microbial contamination of watercourses from agricultural sources requires both environmentally appropriate and socially acceptable mitigation and management approaches. A cross-disciplinary toolkit for on-farm microbial risk assessment is presented that can represent both social and environmental factors promoting or preventing the accumulation of faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) within the farm environment, and also their subsequent transfer to watercourses. Four key risk criteria were identified as governing FIO loss from land to water. These were ‘accumulating E. coli burden to land’, ‘landscape transfer potential’, ‘infrastructure’ and ‘social and economical obstacles to taking action’. The toolkit can be used to determine (i) the relative risk of a farm enterprise contributing to microbial watercourse pollution and (ii) appropriate and targeted mitigation to reduce the risk of FIO loss from land to water. A comparison of the toolkit output with microbiological water quality draining from three contrasting grassland farm enterprises provided a preliminary evaluation of the prototype approach. When applied to 31 grassland farm enterprises the toolkit suggested that 0% were categorised as negligible risk, 32% low, 65% medium, 3% high and 0% very high risk. Such qualitative risk-based tools can assist the policy community not only to target high risk areas, but also to develop mitigation strategies that are sensitive to the different ways in which risk is produced. Capacity for long-term cross-disciplinary research is argued to be the means by which these integrated and more sustainable solutions may emerge.

AB - Diffuse microbial pollution from agriculture is a key contributor to water quality impairment. Reducing the risk of microbial contamination of watercourses from agricultural sources requires both environmentally appropriate and socially acceptable mitigation and management approaches. A cross-disciplinary toolkit for on-farm microbial risk assessment is presented that can represent both social and environmental factors promoting or preventing the accumulation of faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) within the farm environment, and also their subsequent transfer to watercourses. Four key risk criteria were identified as governing FIO loss from land to water. These were ‘accumulating E. coli burden to land’, ‘landscape transfer potential’, ‘infrastructure’ and ‘social and economical obstacles to taking action’. The toolkit can be used to determine (i) the relative risk of a farm enterprise contributing to microbial watercourse pollution and (ii) appropriate and targeted mitigation to reduce the risk of FIO loss from land to water. A comparison of the toolkit output with microbiological water quality draining from three contrasting grassland farm enterprises provided a preliminary evaluation of the prototype approach. When applied to 31 grassland farm enterprises the toolkit suggested that 0% were categorised as negligible risk, 32% low, 65% medium, 3% high and 0% very high risk. Such qualitative risk-based tools can assist the policy community not only to target high risk areas, but also to develop mitigation strategies that are sensitive to the different ways in which risk is produced. Capacity for long-term cross-disciplinary research is argued to be the means by which these integrated and more sustainable solutions may emerge.

KW - cross-disciplinary

KW - decision support

KW - E. coli

KW - faecal indicators

KW - farm

KW - mitigation

KW - risk

KW - microbial pollution

KW - agriculture

KW - pathogen

U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.019

DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.019

M3 - Journal article

VL - 129

SP - 401

EP - 412

JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

SN - 0167-8809

IS - 4

ER -