Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A dilemma in rape crisis and a contribution fro...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A dilemma in rape crisis and a contribution from philosophy

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Article number93
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>8/04/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Volume8
Number of pages9
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The notion that rape is an act of violence rather than sex is a central tenet in rape crisis support and education. A therapeutic benefit of this conceptualisation of rape is that it counters shame and guilt by affirming that the victim was not a complicit partner in an act of sex. However, this conceptualisation has recently been criticised for not capturing what makes rape an especially serious kind of wrong. This raises an apparent dilemma for rape crisis support. Recent work in analytic moral philosophy on the nature of rape offers a way to resolve this dilemma. It is argued that rape is not sex, but is nonetheless sexual. This distinction allows for a charitable reformulation of the central tenet in rape crisis support, which can facilitate the dual therapeutic aims of countering the sense of shame and of recognising the especially serious kind of the harm suffered by the victim.