Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A flexible approach for finding optimal paths w...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A flexible approach for finding optimal paths with minimal conflicts

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

A flexible approach for finding optimal paths with minimal conflicts. / Bowles, Juliana; Caminati, Marco B.
ICFEM: International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods. Vol. 10610 Springer, 2017. p. 209-225.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Bowles, J & Caminati, MB 2017, A flexible approach for finding optimal paths with minimal conflicts. in ICFEM: International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods. vol. 10610, Springer, pp. 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68690-5_13

APA

Bowles, J., & Caminati, M. B. (2017). A flexible approach for finding optimal paths with minimal conflicts. In ICFEM: International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods (Vol. 10610, pp. 209-225). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68690-5_13

Vancouver

Bowles J, Caminati MB. A flexible approach for finding optimal paths with minimal conflicts. In ICFEM: International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods. Vol. 10610. Springer. 2017. p. 209-225 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-68690-5_13

Author

Bowles, Juliana ; Caminati, Marco B. / A flexible approach for finding optimal paths with minimal conflicts. ICFEM: International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods. Vol. 10610 Springer, 2017. pp. 209-225

Bibtex

@inproceedings{4b6055bd7e0a40db8e40ec929da352f0,
title = "A flexible approach for finding optimal paths with minimal conflicts",
abstract = "Complex systems are usually modelled through a combination of structural and behavioural models, where separate behavioural models make it easier to design and understand partial behaviour. When partial models are combined, we need to guarantee that they are consistent, and several automated techniques have been developed to check this. We argue that in some cases it is impossible to guarantee total consistency, and instead we want to find execution paths across such models with minimal conflicts with respect to a certain metric of interest. We present an efficient and scalable solution to find optimal paths through a combination of the theorem prover Isabelle with the constraint solver Z3. Our approach has been inspired by a healthcare problem, namely how to detect conflicts between medications taken by patients with multiple chronic conditions, and how to find preferable alternatives automatically.",
author = "Juliana Bowles and Caminati, {Marco B.}",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
day = "11",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-68690-5_13",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319686905",
volume = "10610",
pages = "209--225",
booktitle = "ICFEM: International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - A flexible approach for finding optimal paths with minimal conflicts

AU - Bowles, Juliana

AU - Caminati, Marco B.

PY - 2017/10/11

Y1 - 2017/10/11

N2 - Complex systems are usually modelled through a combination of structural and behavioural models, where separate behavioural models make it easier to design and understand partial behaviour. When partial models are combined, we need to guarantee that they are consistent, and several automated techniques have been developed to check this. We argue that in some cases it is impossible to guarantee total consistency, and instead we want to find execution paths across such models with minimal conflicts with respect to a certain metric of interest. We present an efficient and scalable solution to find optimal paths through a combination of the theorem prover Isabelle with the constraint solver Z3. Our approach has been inspired by a healthcare problem, namely how to detect conflicts between medications taken by patients with multiple chronic conditions, and how to find preferable alternatives automatically.

AB - Complex systems are usually modelled through a combination of structural and behavioural models, where separate behavioural models make it easier to design and understand partial behaviour. When partial models are combined, we need to guarantee that they are consistent, and several automated techniques have been developed to check this. We argue that in some cases it is impossible to guarantee total consistency, and instead we want to find execution paths across such models with minimal conflicts with respect to a certain metric of interest. We present an efficient and scalable solution to find optimal paths through a combination of the theorem prover Isabelle with the constraint solver Z3. Our approach has been inspired by a healthcare problem, namely how to detect conflicts between medications taken by patients with multiple chronic conditions, and how to find preferable alternatives automatically.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-68690-5_13

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-68690-5_13

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SN - 9783319686905

SN - 9783319686899

VL - 10610

SP - 209

EP - 225

BT - ICFEM: International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods

PB - Springer

ER -