Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A formative evaluation of online information to...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A formative evaluation of online information to support abortion access in England, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A formative evaluation of online information to support abortion access in England, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. / Duffy, Deirdre Niamh; Pierson, Claire; Best, Paul.
In: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, Vol. 45, No. 1, 04.01.2019, p. 32-37.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Duffy DN, Pierson C, Best P. A formative evaluation of online information to support abortion access in England, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. 2019 Jan 4;45(1):32-37. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200086

Author

Duffy, Deirdre Niamh ; Pierson, Claire ; Best, Paul. / A formative evaluation of online information to support abortion access in England, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. In: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. 2019 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 32-37.

Bibtex

@article{7bf018b8bcbd44caa3981b6ce9139406,
title = "A formative evaluation of online information to support abortion access in England, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To evaluate web-based information on accessing abortion services retrieved through internet searches in different jurisdictions from the perspective of service users. To provide a formative evaluative mechanism for enabling user-focused design of abortion access information web pages.DESIGN: Web searches were conducted in three countries-England, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland-using two search engines in the summer of 2016. Four search terms were used and the first two pages of results were analysed. The perspective of someone seeking abortion services was used. Sources were evaluated using a five-item tool combining user-based indicators identified in other instruments and a question on jurisdictional accuracy.RESULTS: A total of 619 web pages were retrieved through initial searches, 83 of which related to accessing services; 22 pages were retrieved from the Republic of Ireland, 31 from Northern Ireland, and 30 from England. Fewer than a third (n=31) were judged as good or excellent by the tool. The jurisdictional relevancy of information retrieved varied; almost half of all results in each country provided information that was either inaccurate within or irrelevant to the jurisdiction where the search took place.CONCLUSIONS: If online information is to support abortion access, the circumstances and perspective of the user requires more attention. Designers of abortion information pages online need to ensure that information about access is relevant to the jurisdiction in which users are based.",
author = "Duffy, {Deirdre Niamh} and Claire Pierson and Paul Best",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200086",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "32--37",
journal = "BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A formative evaluation of online information to support abortion access in England, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland

AU - Duffy, Deirdre Niamh

AU - Pierson, Claire

AU - Best, Paul

PY - 2019/1/4

Y1 - 2019/1/4

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate web-based information on accessing abortion services retrieved through internet searches in different jurisdictions from the perspective of service users. To provide a formative evaluative mechanism for enabling user-focused design of abortion access information web pages.DESIGN: Web searches were conducted in three countries-England, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland-using two search engines in the summer of 2016. Four search terms were used and the first two pages of results were analysed. The perspective of someone seeking abortion services was used. Sources were evaluated using a five-item tool combining user-based indicators identified in other instruments and a question on jurisdictional accuracy.RESULTS: A total of 619 web pages were retrieved through initial searches, 83 of which related to accessing services; 22 pages were retrieved from the Republic of Ireland, 31 from Northern Ireland, and 30 from England. Fewer than a third (n=31) were judged as good or excellent by the tool. The jurisdictional relevancy of information retrieved varied; almost half of all results in each country provided information that was either inaccurate within or irrelevant to the jurisdiction where the search took place.CONCLUSIONS: If online information is to support abortion access, the circumstances and perspective of the user requires more attention. Designers of abortion information pages online need to ensure that information about access is relevant to the jurisdiction in which users are based.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate web-based information on accessing abortion services retrieved through internet searches in different jurisdictions from the perspective of service users. To provide a formative evaluative mechanism for enabling user-focused design of abortion access information web pages.DESIGN: Web searches were conducted in three countries-England, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland-using two search engines in the summer of 2016. Four search terms were used and the first two pages of results were analysed. The perspective of someone seeking abortion services was used. Sources were evaluated using a five-item tool combining user-based indicators identified in other instruments and a question on jurisdictional accuracy.RESULTS: A total of 619 web pages were retrieved through initial searches, 83 of which related to accessing services; 22 pages were retrieved from the Republic of Ireland, 31 from Northern Ireland, and 30 from England. Fewer than a third (n=31) were judged as good or excellent by the tool. The jurisdictional relevancy of information retrieved varied; almost half of all results in each country provided information that was either inaccurate within or irrelevant to the jurisdiction where the search took place.CONCLUSIONS: If online information is to support abortion access, the circumstances and perspective of the user requires more attention. Designers of abortion information pages online need to ensure that information about access is relevant to the jurisdiction in which users are based.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200086

DO - 10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200086

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30181133

VL - 45

SP - 32

EP - 37

JO - BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health

JF - BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health

IS - 1

ER -