Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A grounded theory of interdependence between sp...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A grounded theory of interdependence between specialist and generalist palliative care teams across healthcare settings

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A grounded theory of interdependence between specialist and generalist palliative care teams across healthcare settings. / Thelen, Mary; Walshe, Catherine; Brearley, Sarah.
In: Palliative Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 10, 01.12.2023, p. 1474 - 1483.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Thelen M, Walshe C, Brearley S. A grounded theory of interdependence between specialist and generalist palliative care teams across healthcare settings. Palliative Medicine. 2023 Dec 1;37(10):1474 - 1483. Epub 2023 Sept 10. doi: 10.1177/02692163231195989

Author

Bibtex

@article{b27b6d1df9294f22b7524cb786eb908e,
title = "A grounded theory of interdependence between specialist and generalist palliative care teams across healthcare settings",
abstract = "Background: Individuals with palliative care needs face increased risk of discontinuity of care as they navigate between healthcare settings, locations and practitioners which can result in poor outcomes. Little is known about interactions that occur between specialist and generalist palliative care teams as patients are transition from hospital to community-based care after hospitalisation. Aim: To understand what happens between inpatient specialist palliative care teams and the generalist teams who provide post-discharge palliative care for shared patients. Design: A constructivist grounded theory approach, using semi-structured interviews and constant comparative analysis, including coding, memo-writing and diagram construction. Settings/participants: Interviews ( n = 21) with specialist palliative care clinicians and clinicians in other specialties providing generalist palliative care. Specialists had training in palliative care and worked in specialty palliative care practices; other clinicians worked in primary care or oncology and did not have specialised palliative care training. Results: A grounded theory of interdependence between specialist and generalist palliative care teams across healthcare settings was constructed. Two states of inter-team functioning were found which related to how teams perceived themselves: separate teams or one cross-boundary team. Three conditions influenced these two states of inter-team functioning: knowing the other team; communicating intentionally; and acknowledging and valuing the role of the other team. Conclusions: Teams need to explicitly consider and agree their mode of functioning, and enact changes to enhance knowledge of the team, intentional communication and valuing other teams{\textquoteright} contributions. Future research is needed to test or expand this theory across a range of cultures and contexts.",
keywords = "Palliative care, continuity of patient care, grounded theory, interdisciplinary health team, interprofessional relations, qualitative research",
author = "Mary Thelen and Catherine Walshe and Sarah Brearley",
year = "2023",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/02692163231195989",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1474 -- 1483",
journal = "Palliative Medicine",
issn = "0269-2163",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A grounded theory of interdependence between specialist and generalist palliative care teams across healthcare settings

AU - Thelen, Mary

AU - Walshe, Catherine

AU - Brearley, Sarah

PY - 2023/12/1

Y1 - 2023/12/1

N2 - Background: Individuals with palliative care needs face increased risk of discontinuity of care as they navigate between healthcare settings, locations and practitioners which can result in poor outcomes. Little is known about interactions that occur between specialist and generalist palliative care teams as patients are transition from hospital to community-based care after hospitalisation. Aim: To understand what happens between inpatient specialist palliative care teams and the generalist teams who provide post-discharge palliative care for shared patients. Design: A constructivist grounded theory approach, using semi-structured interviews and constant comparative analysis, including coding, memo-writing and diagram construction. Settings/participants: Interviews ( n = 21) with specialist palliative care clinicians and clinicians in other specialties providing generalist palliative care. Specialists had training in palliative care and worked in specialty palliative care practices; other clinicians worked in primary care or oncology and did not have specialised palliative care training. Results: A grounded theory of interdependence between specialist and generalist palliative care teams across healthcare settings was constructed. Two states of inter-team functioning were found which related to how teams perceived themselves: separate teams or one cross-boundary team. Three conditions influenced these two states of inter-team functioning: knowing the other team; communicating intentionally; and acknowledging and valuing the role of the other team. Conclusions: Teams need to explicitly consider and agree their mode of functioning, and enact changes to enhance knowledge of the team, intentional communication and valuing other teams’ contributions. Future research is needed to test or expand this theory across a range of cultures and contexts.

AB - Background: Individuals with palliative care needs face increased risk of discontinuity of care as they navigate between healthcare settings, locations and practitioners which can result in poor outcomes. Little is known about interactions that occur between specialist and generalist palliative care teams as patients are transition from hospital to community-based care after hospitalisation. Aim: To understand what happens between inpatient specialist palliative care teams and the generalist teams who provide post-discharge palliative care for shared patients. Design: A constructivist grounded theory approach, using semi-structured interviews and constant comparative analysis, including coding, memo-writing and diagram construction. Settings/participants: Interviews ( n = 21) with specialist palliative care clinicians and clinicians in other specialties providing generalist palliative care. Specialists had training in palliative care and worked in specialty palliative care practices; other clinicians worked in primary care or oncology and did not have specialised palliative care training. Results: A grounded theory of interdependence between specialist and generalist palliative care teams across healthcare settings was constructed. Two states of inter-team functioning were found which related to how teams perceived themselves: separate teams or one cross-boundary team. Three conditions influenced these two states of inter-team functioning: knowing the other team; communicating intentionally; and acknowledging and valuing the role of the other team. Conclusions: Teams need to explicitly consider and agree their mode of functioning, and enact changes to enhance knowledge of the team, intentional communication and valuing other teams’ contributions. Future research is needed to test or expand this theory across a range of cultures and contexts.

KW - Palliative care

KW - continuity of patient care

KW - grounded theory

KW - interdisciplinary health team

KW - interprofessional relations

KW - qualitative research

U2 - 10.1177/02692163231195989

DO - 10.1177/02692163231195989

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 1474

EP - 1483

JO - Palliative Medicine

JF - Palliative Medicine

SN - 0269-2163

IS - 10

ER -