Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A mental imagery intervention targeting suicidal ideation in university students
T2 - An assessor-blind, randomised controlled feasibility trial
AU - Palmier-Claus, J.
AU - Duxbury, P.
AU - Pratt, D.
AU - Parker, S.
AU - Sutton, C.
AU - Lobban, F.
AU - Moorhouse, J.
AU - Kerry, E.
AU - Russell, C.
AU - Nyakutsikwa, B.
AU - Drake, R.
AU - Eccles, S.
AU - Randles, N.
AU - Patel, R.
AU - Kelly, J.
AU - Tattersall, R.
AU - Taylor, P.J.
PY - 2025/5/23
Y1 - 2025/5/23
N2 - The Broad-Minded Affective Coping (BMAC) intervention is a theory-driven cognitive therapy aiming to reduce suicidal ideation through guided positive mental imagery. We explored the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the BMAC intervention in university students. The trial was a two-arm, randomised (ratio 1:1) controlled feasibility trial comparing risk assessment and signposting with or without the BMAC intervention (ISRCTN 13621293; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05296538). Participants had recent suicidal ideation or behaviour. Feasibility outcomes concerned recruitment, retention, intervention adherence, completion of a suicidal ideation assessment, and the safety of the procedures. Clinical outcomes and putative mechanisms were recorded at baseline and after eight, 16, and 24-weeks. All feasibility criteria were met. Sixty-five participants were randomized (99 % of target sample). Retention to follow-up was high at all timepoints (89–91 %). In the treatment arm, 30 out of 33 participants (91 %) attended ≥2 sessions of the BMAC. Retained participants completed a suicidal ideation assessment with no missing data. There were 19 serious adverse events, but none were related to the trial procedures or intervention. Effect estimates for suicidal ideation favoured the intervention. The trial and intervention were acceptable, feasible, and safe. The efficacy of the intervention requires evaluation in a definitive trial.
AB - The Broad-Minded Affective Coping (BMAC) intervention is a theory-driven cognitive therapy aiming to reduce suicidal ideation through guided positive mental imagery. We explored the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the BMAC intervention in university students. The trial was a two-arm, randomised (ratio 1:1) controlled feasibility trial comparing risk assessment and signposting with or without the BMAC intervention (ISRCTN 13621293; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05296538). Participants had recent suicidal ideation or behaviour. Feasibility outcomes concerned recruitment, retention, intervention adherence, completion of a suicidal ideation assessment, and the safety of the procedures. Clinical outcomes and putative mechanisms were recorded at baseline and after eight, 16, and 24-weeks. All feasibility criteria were met. Sixty-five participants were randomized (99 % of target sample). Retention to follow-up was high at all timepoints (89–91 %). In the treatment arm, 30 out of 33 participants (91 %) attended ≥2 sessions of the BMAC. Retained participants completed a suicidal ideation assessment with no missing data. There were 19 serious adverse events, but none were related to the trial procedures or intervention. Effect estimates for suicidal ideation favoured the intervention. The trial and intervention were acceptable, feasible, and safe. The efficacy of the intervention requires evaluation in a definitive trial.
U2 - 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104780
DO - 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104780
M3 - Journal article
VL - 191
JO - Behaviour Research and Therapy
JF - Behaviour Research and Therapy
SN - 0005-7967
M1 - 104780
ER -