Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A multi-dimensional contrastive study of Englis...

Electronic data

  • cor%2E2013%2E0041

    Rights statement: © Edinburgh University Press

    Final published version, 214 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and nonnative writers

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and nonnative writers. / Cao, Yan; Xiao, Richard.
In: Corpora, Vol. 8, No. 2, 11.2013, p. 209-234.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Cao Y, Xiao R. A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and nonnative writers. Corpora. 2013 Nov;8(2):209-234. doi: 10.3366/cor.2013.0041

Author

Bibtex

@article{d3eb7e2eec8f409f9c9d1f559e11e0fc,
title = "A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and nonnative writers",
abstract = "This article takes the multidimensional analysis (MDA) approach to explore the textual variations between native and nonnative English abstracts on the basis of two matching balanced corpora composed of English abstracts written respectively by native English and native Chinese writers from twelve academic disciplines. A total of 47 out of 163 linguistic features are retained after factor analysis, which underlies a seven-dimension framework representing seven communicative functions. The results show that the two corpora as a whole have significant difference on five out of the seven dimensions. To be more specific, native English writers demonstrate a more active involvement and commitment in presenting their ideas than Chinese writers. They also use intensifying devices more frequently. In contrast, Chinese writers show stronger preferences for conceptual elaboration, passives and abstract noun phrases no matter whether the two types of data are examined as a whole or variations in disciplines are taken into account. The results are discussed in relation with the possible reasons and suggestions for English abstract writing in China. Methodologically, this study innovatively expands the MDA model by integrating colligation in addition to grammatical and semantic features.",
keywords = "multidimensional analysis, research article abstracts, academic writing, contrastive analysis, Chinese",
author = "Yan Cao and Richard Xiao",
note = "{\textcopyright} Edinburgh University Press",
year = "2013",
month = nov,
doi = "10.3366/cor.2013.0041",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "209--234",
journal = "Corpora",
issn = "1749-5032",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and nonnative writers

AU - Cao, Yan

AU - Xiao, Richard

N1 - © Edinburgh University Press

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - This article takes the multidimensional analysis (MDA) approach to explore the textual variations between native and nonnative English abstracts on the basis of two matching balanced corpora composed of English abstracts written respectively by native English and native Chinese writers from twelve academic disciplines. A total of 47 out of 163 linguistic features are retained after factor analysis, which underlies a seven-dimension framework representing seven communicative functions. The results show that the two corpora as a whole have significant difference on five out of the seven dimensions. To be more specific, native English writers demonstrate a more active involvement and commitment in presenting their ideas than Chinese writers. They also use intensifying devices more frequently. In contrast, Chinese writers show stronger preferences for conceptual elaboration, passives and abstract noun phrases no matter whether the two types of data are examined as a whole or variations in disciplines are taken into account. The results are discussed in relation with the possible reasons and suggestions for English abstract writing in China. Methodologically, this study innovatively expands the MDA model by integrating colligation in addition to grammatical and semantic features.

AB - This article takes the multidimensional analysis (MDA) approach to explore the textual variations between native and nonnative English abstracts on the basis of two matching balanced corpora composed of English abstracts written respectively by native English and native Chinese writers from twelve academic disciplines. A total of 47 out of 163 linguistic features are retained after factor analysis, which underlies a seven-dimension framework representing seven communicative functions. The results show that the two corpora as a whole have significant difference on five out of the seven dimensions. To be more specific, native English writers demonstrate a more active involvement and commitment in presenting their ideas than Chinese writers. They also use intensifying devices more frequently. In contrast, Chinese writers show stronger preferences for conceptual elaboration, passives and abstract noun phrases no matter whether the two types of data are examined as a whole or variations in disciplines are taken into account. The results are discussed in relation with the possible reasons and suggestions for English abstract writing in China. Methodologically, this study innovatively expands the MDA model by integrating colligation in addition to grammatical and semantic features.

KW - multidimensional analysis

KW - research article abstracts

KW - academic writing

KW - contrastive analysis

KW - Chinese

U2 - 10.3366/cor.2013.0041

DO - 10.3366/cor.2013.0041

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 209

EP - 234

JO - Corpora

JF - Corpora

SN - 1749-5032

IS - 2

ER -