Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A persistent non-uniformitarian paleomagnetic f...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A persistent non-uniformitarian paleomagnetic field in the Devonian?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A persistent non-uniformitarian paleomagnetic field in the Devonian? / van der Boon, A.; Biggin, A.J.; Thallner, D. et al.
In: Earth-Science Reviews, Vol. 231, 104073, 31.08.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

van der Boon, A, Biggin, AJ, Thallner, D, Hounslow, MW, Bono, R, Nawrocki, J, Wójcik, K, Paszkowski, M, Königshof, P, de Backer, T, Kabanov, P, Gouwy, S, VandenBerg, R & Da Silva, A-C 2022, 'A persistent non-uniformitarian paleomagnetic field in the Devonian?', Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 231, 104073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104073

APA

van der Boon, A., Biggin, A. J., Thallner, D., Hounslow, M. W., Bono, R., Nawrocki, J., Wójcik, K., Paszkowski, M., Königshof, P., de Backer, T., Kabanov, P., Gouwy, S., VandenBerg, R., & Da Silva, A-C. (2022). A persistent non-uniformitarian paleomagnetic field in the Devonian? Earth-Science Reviews, 231, Article 104073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104073

Vancouver

van der Boon A, Biggin AJ, Thallner D, Hounslow MW, Bono R, Nawrocki J et al. A persistent non-uniformitarian paleomagnetic field in the Devonian? Earth-Science Reviews. 2022 Aug 31;231:104073. Epub 2022 Jun 10. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104073

Author

van der Boon, A. ; Biggin, A.J. ; Thallner, D. et al. / A persistent non-uniformitarian paleomagnetic field in the Devonian?. In: Earth-Science Reviews. 2022 ; Vol. 231.

Bibtex

@article{a603a30f6f0c4a588e0232977dcbaee8,
title = "A persistent non-uniformitarian paleomagnetic field in the Devonian?",
abstract = "The Devonian has long been a problematic period for paleomagnetism. Devonian paleomagnetic data are generally difficult to interpret and have complex partial or full overprints– problems that arise in data obtained from both sedimentary and igneous rocks. As a result, the reconstruction of tectonic plate motions, largely performed using apparent polar wander paths, has large uncertainty. Similarly, the Devonian geomagnetic polarity time scale is very poorly constrained. Paleointensity studies from volcanic units suggest that the field was much weaker than the modern field, and it has been hypothesised that this was accompanied by many polarity reversals (a hyperreversing field). We sampled Middle to Upper Devonian sections in Germany, Poland and Canada which show low conodont alteration indices, implying low thermal maturity. We show that there are significant issues with these data, which are not straightforward to interpret, even though no significant heating or remineralisation appears to have caused overprinting. We compare our data to other magnetostratigraphic studies from the Devonian and review the polarity pattern as presented in the Geologic Time Scale. Combined with estimates for the strength of the magnetic field, we suggest that the field during the Devonian might have been so weak, and in part non-dipolar, that obtaining reliable primary paleomagnetic data from Devonian rocks is challenging. Careful examination of all data, no matter how unusual, is the best way to push forward our understanding of the Devonian magnetic field. Paleointensity studies show that the field during the Devonian had a similar low strength to the Ediacaran. Independent evidence from malformed spores around the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary suggests that the terrestrial extinction connected to the Hangenberg event was caused by increased UV-B radiation, supporting the weak field hypothesis. A fundamentally weak and possibly non-dipolar field during the Devonian could have been produced, in part, by true polar wander acting to maximise core-mantle heat flow in the equatorial region. It may also have influenced evolution and extinctions in this time period. There are a large number of paleobiological crises in the Devonian, and we pose the question, did the Earth's magnetic field influence these crises?",
keywords = "Magnetostratigraphy, Paleomagnetism, Non-dipolarity, Remagnetisation, Paleobiological crises",
author = "{van der Boon}, A. and A.J. Biggin and D. Thallner and M.W. Hounslow and R. Bono and J. Nawrocki and K. W{\'o}jcik and M. Paszkowski and P. K{\"o}nigshof and {de Backer}, T. and P. Kabanov and S. Gouwy and R. VandenBerg and {Da Silva}, A.-C.",
year = "2022",
month = aug,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104073",
language = "English",
volume = "231",
journal = "Earth-Science Reviews",
issn = "0012-8252",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A persistent non-uniformitarian paleomagnetic field in the Devonian?

AU - van der Boon, A.

AU - Biggin, A.J.

AU - Thallner, D.

AU - Hounslow, M.W.

AU - Bono, R.

AU - Nawrocki, J.

AU - Wójcik, K.

AU - Paszkowski, M.

AU - Königshof, P.

AU - de Backer, T.

AU - Kabanov, P.

AU - Gouwy, S.

AU - VandenBerg, R.

AU - Da Silva, A.-C.

PY - 2022/8/31

Y1 - 2022/8/31

N2 - The Devonian has long been a problematic period for paleomagnetism. Devonian paleomagnetic data are generally difficult to interpret and have complex partial or full overprints– problems that arise in data obtained from both sedimentary and igneous rocks. As a result, the reconstruction of tectonic plate motions, largely performed using apparent polar wander paths, has large uncertainty. Similarly, the Devonian geomagnetic polarity time scale is very poorly constrained. Paleointensity studies from volcanic units suggest that the field was much weaker than the modern field, and it has been hypothesised that this was accompanied by many polarity reversals (a hyperreversing field). We sampled Middle to Upper Devonian sections in Germany, Poland and Canada which show low conodont alteration indices, implying low thermal maturity. We show that there are significant issues with these data, which are not straightforward to interpret, even though no significant heating or remineralisation appears to have caused overprinting. We compare our data to other magnetostratigraphic studies from the Devonian and review the polarity pattern as presented in the Geologic Time Scale. Combined with estimates for the strength of the magnetic field, we suggest that the field during the Devonian might have been so weak, and in part non-dipolar, that obtaining reliable primary paleomagnetic data from Devonian rocks is challenging. Careful examination of all data, no matter how unusual, is the best way to push forward our understanding of the Devonian magnetic field. Paleointensity studies show that the field during the Devonian had a similar low strength to the Ediacaran. Independent evidence from malformed spores around the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary suggests that the terrestrial extinction connected to the Hangenberg event was caused by increased UV-B radiation, supporting the weak field hypothesis. A fundamentally weak and possibly non-dipolar field during the Devonian could have been produced, in part, by true polar wander acting to maximise core-mantle heat flow in the equatorial region. It may also have influenced evolution and extinctions in this time period. There are a large number of paleobiological crises in the Devonian, and we pose the question, did the Earth's magnetic field influence these crises?

AB - The Devonian has long been a problematic period for paleomagnetism. Devonian paleomagnetic data are generally difficult to interpret and have complex partial or full overprints– problems that arise in data obtained from both sedimentary and igneous rocks. As a result, the reconstruction of tectonic plate motions, largely performed using apparent polar wander paths, has large uncertainty. Similarly, the Devonian geomagnetic polarity time scale is very poorly constrained. Paleointensity studies from volcanic units suggest that the field was much weaker than the modern field, and it has been hypothesised that this was accompanied by many polarity reversals (a hyperreversing field). We sampled Middle to Upper Devonian sections in Germany, Poland and Canada which show low conodont alteration indices, implying low thermal maturity. We show that there are significant issues with these data, which are not straightforward to interpret, even though no significant heating or remineralisation appears to have caused overprinting. We compare our data to other magnetostratigraphic studies from the Devonian and review the polarity pattern as presented in the Geologic Time Scale. Combined with estimates for the strength of the magnetic field, we suggest that the field during the Devonian might have been so weak, and in part non-dipolar, that obtaining reliable primary paleomagnetic data from Devonian rocks is challenging. Careful examination of all data, no matter how unusual, is the best way to push forward our understanding of the Devonian magnetic field. Paleointensity studies show that the field during the Devonian had a similar low strength to the Ediacaran. Independent evidence from malformed spores around the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary suggests that the terrestrial extinction connected to the Hangenberg event was caused by increased UV-B radiation, supporting the weak field hypothesis. A fundamentally weak and possibly non-dipolar field during the Devonian could have been produced, in part, by true polar wander acting to maximise core-mantle heat flow in the equatorial region. It may also have influenced evolution and extinctions in this time period. There are a large number of paleobiological crises in the Devonian, and we pose the question, did the Earth's magnetic field influence these crises?

KW - Magnetostratigraphy

KW - Paleomagnetism

KW - Non-dipolarity

KW - Remagnetisation

KW - Paleobiological crises

U2 - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104073

DO - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104073

M3 - Journal article

VL - 231

JO - Earth-Science Reviews

JF - Earth-Science Reviews

SN - 0012-8252

M1 - 104073

ER -