Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A rare structure at the syntax-discourse interface

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A rare structure at the syntax-discourse interface: Heritage and spanish-dominant native speakers weigh in

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A rare structure at the syntax-discourse interface: Heritage and spanish-dominant native speakers weigh in. / Leal, Tania; Rothman, Jason; Slabakova, Roumyana.
In: Language Acquisition, Vol. 21, No. 4, A006, 31.12.2014, p. 411-429.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Leal T, Rothman J, Slabakova R. A rare structure at the syntax-discourse interface: Heritage and spanish-dominant native speakers weigh in. Language Acquisition. 2014 Dec 31;21(4):411-429. A006. Epub 2014 Aug 21. doi: 10.1080/10489223.2014.892946

Author

Leal, Tania ; Rothman, Jason ; Slabakova, Roumyana. / A rare structure at the syntax-discourse interface : Heritage and spanish-dominant native speakers weigh in. In: Language Acquisition. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 411-429.

Bibtex

@article{203131d6accb460c8c266b18dfb3ec3d,
title = "A rare structure at the syntax-discourse interface: Heritage and spanish-dominant native speakers weigh in",
abstract = "The present study examines knowledge of the discourse-appropriateness of Clitic Right Dislocation (CLRD) in a population of Heritage (HS) and Spanish-dominant Native Speakers in order to test the predictions of the Interface Hypothesis (IH; Sorace 2011). The IH predicts that speakers in language contact situations will experience difficulties with integrating information involving the interface of syntax and discourse modules. CLRD relates a dislocated constituent to a discourse antecedent, requiring integration of syntax and pragmatics. Results from an acceptability judgment task did not support the predictions of the IH. No statistical differences between the HSs{\textquoteright} performance and that of L1-dominant native speakers were evidenced when participants were presented with an offline task. Thus, our study did not find any evidence of “incomplete acquisition” (Montrul 2008) as it pertains to this specific linguistic structure.",
author = "Tania Leal and Jason Rothman and Roumyana Slabakova",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.",
year = "2014",
month = dec,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/10489223.2014.892946",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "411--429",
journal = "Language Acquisition",
issn = "1048-9223",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A rare structure at the syntax-discourse interface

T2 - Heritage and spanish-dominant native speakers weigh in

AU - Leal, Tania

AU - Rothman, Jason

AU - Slabakova, Roumyana

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2014, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

PY - 2014/12/31

Y1 - 2014/12/31

N2 - The present study examines knowledge of the discourse-appropriateness of Clitic Right Dislocation (CLRD) in a population of Heritage (HS) and Spanish-dominant Native Speakers in order to test the predictions of the Interface Hypothesis (IH; Sorace 2011). The IH predicts that speakers in language contact situations will experience difficulties with integrating information involving the interface of syntax and discourse modules. CLRD relates a dislocated constituent to a discourse antecedent, requiring integration of syntax and pragmatics. Results from an acceptability judgment task did not support the predictions of the IH. No statistical differences between the HSs’ performance and that of L1-dominant native speakers were evidenced when participants were presented with an offline task. Thus, our study did not find any evidence of “incomplete acquisition” (Montrul 2008) as it pertains to this specific linguistic structure.

AB - The present study examines knowledge of the discourse-appropriateness of Clitic Right Dislocation (CLRD) in a population of Heritage (HS) and Spanish-dominant Native Speakers in order to test the predictions of the Interface Hypothesis (IH; Sorace 2011). The IH predicts that speakers in language contact situations will experience difficulties with integrating information involving the interface of syntax and discourse modules. CLRD relates a dislocated constituent to a discourse antecedent, requiring integration of syntax and pragmatics. Results from an acceptability judgment task did not support the predictions of the IH. No statistical differences between the HSs’ performance and that of L1-dominant native speakers were evidenced when participants were presented with an offline task. Thus, our study did not find any evidence of “incomplete acquisition” (Montrul 2008) as it pertains to this specific linguistic structure.

U2 - 10.1080/10489223.2014.892946

DO - 10.1080/10489223.2014.892946

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84940505122

VL - 21

SP - 411

EP - 429

JO - Language Acquisition

JF - Language Acquisition

SN - 1048-9223

IS - 4

M1 - A006

ER -