Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A review of the reprocessability of uranium nit...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A review of the reprocessability of uranium nitride based fuels

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A review of the reprocessability of uranium nitride based fuels. / Jones, S.; Boxall, C.; Maher, C. et al.
In: Progress in Nuclear Energy, Vol. 165, 104917, 30.11.2023.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Jones, S, Boxall, C, Maher, C & Taylor, R 2023, 'A review of the reprocessability of uranium nitride based fuels', Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 165, 104917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.104917

APA

Jones, S., Boxall, C., Maher, C., & Taylor, R. (2023). A review of the reprocessability of uranium nitride based fuels. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 165, Article 104917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.104917

Vancouver

Jones S, Boxall C, Maher C, Taylor R. A review of the reprocessability of uranium nitride based fuels. Progress in Nuclear Energy. 2023 Nov 30;165:104917. Epub 2023 Oct 2. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.104917

Author

Jones, S. ; Boxall, C. ; Maher, C. et al. / A review of the reprocessability of uranium nitride based fuels. In: Progress in Nuclear Energy. 2023 ; Vol. 165.

Bibtex

@article{d267645c24e04ba0b493d77eeebfe65c,
title = "A review of the reprocessability of uranium nitride based fuels",
abstract = "This article presents a review of the behaviour of uranium nitride (UN) fuels during thermal reactor fuel-based reprocessing. UN is one of the leading candidate materials for use in Advanced Technology Fuels (ATFs) due to it having several superior properties over UO2 or MOx based fuels, including: good thermal conductivity; high melting point; low thermal expansion; high fissile density; and good compatibility with metallic or gaseous coolants currently under consideration for Generation IV reactors. However, it also has a number of drawbacks in fuel-based applications including expected higher fabrication costs and oxidative instability in water. The former is mainly due to the expected need to enrich the nitrogen component in 15N to increase the neutron economy and avoid formation of 14C from the n,p reaction of 14N. The latter property may be advantageous for UN's post-irradiation reprocessing but must be addressed if UN is to be deployed safely in the near term in existing and under-construction LWR reactors. One means by which UN's hydrolytic instability may be addressed is by the introduction of suitable protective dopants such as Al, Cr or Zr to greatly increase oxidative resistance. However, this may also impact on the reprocessability of spent UN post-irradiation. Thus, in this review, we will focus on the management and recycle options for UN fuels after irradiation. Whilst 15N enrichment is an important potential economic driver of the reprocessing of spent UN, it is not the primary concern of this review. Rather, we focus on issues that may arise during the dissolution and head-end treatment of UN fuels, and the subsequent expected behaviour of the dissolved fuel in existing and proposed solvent extraction processes. Where they exist, similarities with the reprocessing of thermal UO2 fuels will be highlighted, as will the effect of protective dopant materials on the chemistry of UN reprocessing.",
keywords = "Nitride fuels, Reprocessing, Dissolution, Head-end, Separations",
author = "S. Jones and C. Boxall and C. Maher and R. Taylor",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.104917",
language = "English",
volume = "165",
journal = "Progress in Nuclear Energy",
issn = "0149-1970",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the reprocessability of uranium nitride based fuels

AU - Jones, S.

AU - Boxall, C.

AU - Maher, C.

AU - Taylor, R.

PY - 2023/11/30

Y1 - 2023/11/30

N2 - This article presents a review of the behaviour of uranium nitride (UN) fuels during thermal reactor fuel-based reprocessing. UN is one of the leading candidate materials for use in Advanced Technology Fuels (ATFs) due to it having several superior properties over UO2 or MOx based fuels, including: good thermal conductivity; high melting point; low thermal expansion; high fissile density; and good compatibility with metallic or gaseous coolants currently under consideration for Generation IV reactors. However, it also has a number of drawbacks in fuel-based applications including expected higher fabrication costs and oxidative instability in water. The former is mainly due to the expected need to enrich the nitrogen component in 15N to increase the neutron economy and avoid formation of 14C from the n,p reaction of 14N. The latter property may be advantageous for UN's post-irradiation reprocessing but must be addressed if UN is to be deployed safely in the near term in existing and under-construction LWR reactors. One means by which UN's hydrolytic instability may be addressed is by the introduction of suitable protective dopants such as Al, Cr or Zr to greatly increase oxidative resistance. However, this may also impact on the reprocessability of spent UN post-irradiation. Thus, in this review, we will focus on the management and recycle options for UN fuels after irradiation. Whilst 15N enrichment is an important potential economic driver of the reprocessing of spent UN, it is not the primary concern of this review. Rather, we focus on issues that may arise during the dissolution and head-end treatment of UN fuels, and the subsequent expected behaviour of the dissolved fuel in existing and proposed solvent extraction processes. Where they exist, similarities with the reprocessing of thermal UO2 fuels will be highlighted, as will the effect of protective dopant materials on the chemistry of UN reprocessing.

AB - This article presents a review of the behaviour of uranium nitride (UN) fuels during thermal reactor fuel-based reprocessing. UN is one of the leading candidate materials for use in Advanced Technology Fuels (ATFs) due to it having several superior properties over UO2 or MOx based fuels, including: good thermal conductivity; high melting point; low thermal expansion; high fissile density; and good compatibility with metallic or gaseous coolants currently under consideration for Generation IV reactors. However, it also has a number of drawbacks in fuel-based applications including expected higher fabrication costs and oxidative instability in water. The former is mainly due to the expected need to enrich the nitrogen component in 15N to increase the neutron economy and avoid formation of 14C from the n,p reaction of 14N. The latter property may be advantageous for UN's post-irradiation reprocessing but must be addressed if UN is to be deployed safely in the near term in existing and under-construction LWR reactors. One means by which UN's hydrolytic instability may be addressed is by the introduction of suitable protective dopants such as Al, Cr or Zr to greatly increase oxidative resistance. However, this may also impact on the reprocessability of spent UN post-irradiation. Thus, in this review, we will focus on the management and recycle options for UN fuels after irradiation. Whilst 15N enrichment is an important potential economic driver of the reprocessing of spent UN, it is not the primary concern of this review. Rather, we focus on issues that may arise during the dissolution and head-end treatment of UN fuels, and the subsequent expected behaviour of the dissolved fuel in existing and proposed solvent extraction processes. Where they exist, similarities with the reprocessing of thermal UO2 fuels will be highlighted, as will the effect of protective dopant materials on the chemistry of UN reprocessing.

KW - Nitride fuels

KW - Reprocessing

KW - Dissolution

KW - Head-end

KW - Separations

U2 - 10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.104917

DO - 10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.104917

M3 - Journal article

VL - 165

JO - Progress in Nuclear Energy

JF - Progress in Nuclear Energy

SN - 0149-1970

M1 - 104917

ER -