Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A scoping review protocol

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A scoping review protocol: Investigating the extent and legal process of cauda equina syndrome claims for UK physiotherapists

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A scoping review protocol: Investigating the extent and legal process of cauda equina syndrome claims for UK physiotherapists. / Leech, Rachel L.; Selfe, James; Ball, Suzanne et al.
In: Musculoskeletal Care, Vol. 19, No. 4, 31.12.2021, p. 457-461.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Leech, RL, Selfe, J, Ball, S, Greenhalgh, S, Hogan, G, Holway, J, Willis, E & Yeowell, G 2021, 'A scoping review protocol: Investigating the extent and legal process of cauda equina syndrome claims for UK physiotherapists', Musculoskeletal Care, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 457-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1550

APA

Leech, R. L., Selfe, J., Ball, S., Greenhalgh, S., Hogan, G., Holway, J., Willis, E., & Yeowell, G. (2021). A scoping review protocol: Investigating the extent and legal process of cauda equina syndrome claims for UK physiotherapists. Musculoskeletal Care, 19(4), 457-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1550

Vancouver

Leech RL, Selfe J, Ball S, Greenhalgh S, Hogan G, Holway J et al. A scoping review protocol: Investigating the extent and legal process of cauda equina syndrome claims for UK physiotherapists. Musculoskeletal Care. 2021 Dec 31;19(4):457-461. Epub 2021 Mar 11. doi: 10.1002/msc.1550

Author

Leech, Rachel L. ; Selfe, James ; Ball, Suzanne et al. / A scoping review protocol : Investigating the extent and legal process of cauda equina syndrome claims for UK physiotherapists. In: Musculoskeletal Care. 2021 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 457-461.

Bibtex

@article{13c67aca34444b6d99dce5b943b0779f,
title = "A scoping review protocol: Investigating the extent and legal process of cauda equina syndrome claims for UK physiotherapists",
abstract = "Introduction Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a condition where early identification and treatment is crucial to avoid potentially devastating effects. There is a high number of litigation cases linked with CES given it is a relatively rare condition. This scoping review protocol proposes to explore the extent and process of CES litigation in UK healthcare context cases amongst UK physiotherapists. Methods and analysis The methodological framework recommended by Arksey and O'Malley, Levac et al. and the Joanna Briggs Institute will be used throughout this review to aid reporting and transparency. A patient and public involvement (PPI) group meeting was convened at the beginning of the review process in order to provide knowledge exchange to inform the search strategy and propose resources to be used during the scoping review. Two reviewers will independently review the literature in order to apply the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Once the studies to be included have been identified, the data from these studies will be extracted and charted. Results will show quantitative data of the studies included in the review and a narrative synthesis of the literature. Dissemination This scoping review will evaluate the existing knowledge relating to CES and litigation and will map the key concepts around this topic. Results will be disseminated to practitioners and policy‐makers through peer‐reviewed publications, conferences, reports and social media. This method may prove helpful to others who are investigating extent and processes relating to medicolegal cases involving healthcare practitioners.",
author = "Leech, {Rachel L.} and James Selfe and Suzanne Ball and Susan Greenhalgh and Gareth Hogan and Janene Holway and Emma Willis and Gillian Yeowell",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1002/msc.1550",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "457--461",
journal = "Musculoskeletal Care",
issn = "1478-2189",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A scoping review protocol

T2 - Investigating the extent and legal process of cauda equina syndrome claims for UK physiotherapists

AU - Leech, Rachel L.

AU - Selfe, James

AU - Ball, Suzanne

AU - Greenhalgh, Susan

AU - Hogan, Gareth

AU - Holway, Janene

AU - Willis, Emma

AU - Yeowell, Gillian

PY - 2021/12/31

Y1 - 2021/12/31

N2 - Introduction Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a condition where early identification and treatment is crucial to avoid potentially devastating effects. There is a high number of litigation cases linked with CES given it is a relatively rare condition. This scoping review protocol proposes to explore the extent and process of CES litigation in UK healthcare context cases amongst UK physiotherapists. Methods and analysis The methodological framework recommended by Arksey and O'Malley, Levac et al. and the Joanna Briggs Institute will be used throughout this review to aid reporting and transparency. A patient and public involvement (PPI) group meeting was convened at the beginning of the review process in order to provide knowledge exchange to inform the search strategy and propose resources to be used during the scoping review. Two reviewers will independently review the literature in order to apply the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Once the studies to be included have been identified, the data from these studies will be extracted and charted. Results will show quantitative data of the studies included in the review and a narrative synthesis of the literature. Dissemination This scoping review will evaluate the existing knowledge relating to CES and litigation and will map the key concepts around this topic. Results will be disseminated to practitioners and policy‐makers through peer‐reviewed publications, conferences, reports and social media. This method may prove helpful to others who are investigating extent and processes relating to medicolegal cases involving healthcare practitioners.

AB - Introduction Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a condition where early identification and treatment is crucial to avoid potentially devastating effects. There is a high number of litigation cases linked with CES given it is a relatively rare condition. This scoping review protocol proposes to explore the extent and process of CES litigation in UK healthcare context cases amongst UK physiotherapists. Methods and analysis The methodological framework recommended by Arksey and O'Malley, Levac et al. and the Joanna Briggs Institute will be used throughout this review to aid reporting and transparency. A patient and public involvement (PPI) group meeting was convened at the beginning of the review process in order to provide knowledge exchange to inform the search strategy and propose resources to be used during the scoping review. Two reviewers will independently review the literature in order to apply the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Once the studies to be included have been identified, the data from these studies will be extracted and charted. Results will show quantitative data of the studies included in the review and a narrative synthesis of the literature. Dissemination This scoping review will evaluate the existing knowledge relating to CES and litigation and will map the key concepts around this topic. Results will be disseminated to practitioners and policy‐makers through peer‐reviewed publications, conferences, reports and social media. This method may prove helpful to others who are investigating extent and processes relating to medicolegal cases involving healthcare practitioners.

U2 - 10.1002/msc.1550

DO - 10.1002/msc.1550

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 457

EP - 461

JO - Musculoskeletal Care

JF - Musculoskeletal Care

SN - 1478-2189

IS - 4

ER -