Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A social-ecological approach to conservation pl...

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Literature review › peer-review

Published

Standard

A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. / Ban, Natalie C.; Mills, Morena; Tam, Jordan et al.
In: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 11, No. 4, 05.2013, p. 194-202.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Literature review › peer-review

Harvard

Ban, NC, Mills, M, Tam, J, Hicks, CC, Klain, S, Stoeckl, N, Bottrill, MC, Levine, J, Pressey, RL, Satterfield, T & Chan, KMA 2013, 'A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations', Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 194-202. https://doi.org/10.1890/110205

APA

Ban, N. C., Mills, M., Tam, J., Hicks, C. C., Klain, S., Stoeckl, N., Bottrill, M. C., Levine, J., Pressey, R. L., Satterfield, T., & Chan, K. M. A. (2013). A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(4), 194-202. https://doi.org/10.1890/110205

Vancouver

Ban NC, Mills M, Tam J, Hicks CC, Klain S, Stoeckl N et al. A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2013 May;11(4):194-202. doi: 10.1890/110205

Author

Ban, Natalie C. ; Mills, Morena ; Tam, Jordan et al. / A social-ecological approach to conservation planning : embedding social considerations. In: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2013 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 194-202.

Bibtex

@article{4ae4c21e64c94b8d8dca78288db370a5,
title = "A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations",
abstract = "Many conservation plans remain unimplemented, in part because of insufficient consideration of the social processes that influence conservation decisions. Complementing social considerations with an integrated understanding of the ecology of a region can result in a more complete conservation approach. We suggest that linking conservation planning to a social-ecological systems (SES) framework can lead to a more thorough understanding of human-environment interactions and more effective integration of social considerations. By characterizing SES as a set of subsystems, and their interactions with each other and with external factors, the SES framework can improve our understanding of the linkages between social and ecological influences on the environment. Using this framework can help to identify socially and ecologically focused conservation actions that will benefit ecosystems and human communities, and assist in the development of more consistent evidence for evaluating conservation actions by comparing conservation case studies.",
keywords = "BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION, MARINE CONSERVATION, RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT, IMPLEMENTATION, AREAS, COMMUNITY, OPPORTUNISM, CHALLENGES, LANDSCAPE, FRAMEWORK",
author = "Ban, {Natalie C.} and Morena Mills and Jordan Tam and Hicks, {Christina C.} and Sarah Klain and Natalie Stoeckl and Bottrill, {Madeleine C.} and Jordan Levine and Pressey, {Robert L.} and Terre Satterfield and Chan, {Kai M. A.}",
year = "2013",
month = may,
doi = "10.1890/110205",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "194--202",
journal = "Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment",
issn = "1540-9295",
publisher = "ECOLOGICAL SOC AMER",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A social-ecological approach to conservation planning

T2 - embedding social considerations

AU - Ban, Natalie C.

AU - Mills, Morena

AU - Tam, Jordan

AU - Hicks, Christina C.

AU - Klain, Sarah

AU - Stoeckl, Natalie

AU - Bottrill, Madeleine C.

AU - Levine, Jordan

AU - Pressey, Robert L.

AU - Satterfield, Terre

AU - Chan, Kai M. A.

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Many conservation plans remain unimplemented, in part because of insufficient consideration of the social processes that influence conservation decisions. Complementing social considerations with an integrated understanding of the ecology of a region can result in a more complete conservation approach. We suggest that linking conservation planning to a social-ecological systems (SES) framework can lead to a more thorough understanding of human-environment interactions and more effective integration of social considerations. By characterizing SES as a set of subsystems, and their interactions with each other and with external factors, the SES framework can improve our understanding of the linkages between social and ecological influences on the environment. Using this framework can help to identify socially and ecologically focused conservation actions that will benefit ecosystems and human communities, and assist in the development of more consistent evidence for evaluating conservation actions by comparing conservation case studies.

AB - Many conservation plans remain unimplemented, in part because of insufficient consideration of the social processes that influence conservation decisions. Complementing social considerations with an integrated understanding of the ecology of a region can result in a more complete conservation approach. We suggest that linking conservation planning to a social-ecological systems (SES) framework can lead to a more thorough understanding of human-environment interactions and more effective integration of social considerations. By characterizing SES as a set of subsystems, and their interactions with each other and with external factors, the SES framework can improve our understanding of the linkages between social and ecological influences on the environment. Using this framework can help to identify socially and ecologically focused conservation actions that will benefit ecosystems and human communities, and assist in the development of more consistent evidence for evaluating conservation actions by comparing conservation case studies.

KW - BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION

KW - MARINE CONSERVATION

KW - RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT

KW - IMPLEMENTATION

KW - AREAS

KW - COMMUNITY

KW - OPPORTUNISM

KW - CHALLENGES

KW - LANDSCAPE

KW - FRAMEWORK

U2 - 10.1890/110205

DO - 10.1890/110205

M3 - Literature review

VL - 11

SP - 194

EP - 202

JO - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

JF - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

SN - 1540-9295

IS - 4

ER -