Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A sound methodology

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A sound methodology: Measuring experiences of violent conflict through audio self-interviews

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A sound methodology: Measuring experiences of violent conflict through audio self-interviews. / von Russdorf, S.; Ahlborn, L.; Hidalgo-Arestegui, A. et al.
In: Economics Letters, Vol. 242, 111879, 30.09.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

von Russdorf S, Ahlborn L, Hidalgo-Arestegui A, McQuade G, Favara M. A sound methodology: Measuring experiences of violent conflict through audio self-interviews. Economics Letters. 2024 Sept 30;242:111879. Epub 2024 Aug 6. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111879

Author

von Russdorf, S. ; Ahlborn, L. ; Hidalgo-Arestegui, A. et al. / A sound methodology : Measuring experiences of violent conflict through audio self-interviews. In: Economics Letters. 2024 ; Vol. 242.

Bibtex

@article{aa9771d970a84025868e7a0ecd011978,
title = "A sound methodology: Measuring experiences of violent conflict through audio self-interviews",
abstract = "This paper investigates the impact of different survey administration methods on the disclosure of sensitive or traumatic experiences. Respondents of a pilot study in Ethiopia were randomly assigned to answer questions either using audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) or as part of a face-to-face (FtF) enumerator-based interview. Results indicate that ACASI led to higher disclosure rates of conflict-related experiences, particularly for the most sensitive questions, i.e., when either the respondent or a close friend or family member was the victim, or when the trauma suffered was more severe. ACASI offers a viable solution to measure traumatic conflict-related experience exposure in low-literacy settings, overcoming the underestimation problem commonly observed when using standard survey methods.",
author = "{von Russdorf}, S. and L. Ahlborn and A. Hidalgo-Arestegui and G. McQuade and M. Favara",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111879",
language = "English",
volume = "242",
journal = "Economics Letters",
issn = "0165-1765",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A sound methodology

T2 - Measuring experiences of violent conflict through audio self-interviews

AU - von Russdorf, S.

AU - Ahlborn, L.

AU - Hidalgo-Arestegui, A.

AU - McQuade, G.

AU - Favara, M.

PY - 2024/9/30

Y1 - 2024/9/30

N2 - This paper investigates the impact of different survey administration methods on the disclosure of sensitive or traumatic experiences. Respondents of a pilot study in Ethiopia were randomly assigned to answer questions either using audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) or as part of a face-to-face (FtF) enumerator-based interview. Results indicate that ACASI led to higher disclosure rates of conflict-related experiences, particularly for the most sensitive questions, i.e., when either the respondent or a close friend or family member was the victim, or when the trauma suffered was more severe. ACASI offers a viable solution to measure traumatic conflict-related experience exposure in low-literacy settings, overcoming the underestimation problem commonly observed when using standard survey methods.

AB - This paper investigates the impact of different survey administration methods on the disclosure of sensitive or traumatic experiences. Respondents of a pilot study in Ethiopia were randomly assigned to answer questions either using audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) or as part of a face-to-face (FtF) enumerator-based interview. Results indicate that ACASI led to higher disclosure rates of conflict-related experiences, particularly for the most sensitive questions, i.e., when either the respondent or a close friend or family member was the victim, or when the trauma suffered was more severe. ACASI offers a viable solution to measure traumatic conflict-related experience exposure in low-literacy settings, overcoming the underestimation problem commonly observed when using standard survey methods.

U2 - 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111879

DO - 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111879

M3 - Journal article

VL - 242

JO - Economics Letters

JF - Economics Letters

SN - 0165-1765

M1 - 111879

ER -