Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A study of nurture groups as a window into scho...

Electronic data

  • Warin and Hibbin IJNE paper

    Accepted author manuscript, 707 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

View graph of relations

A study of nurture groups as a window into school relationships

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A study of nurture groups as a window into school relationships. / Warin, Joanna; Hibbin, Rebecca Alison.

In: The International Journal of Nurture in Education, Vol. 2, 04.01.2016, p. 7-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Warin, J & Hibbin, RA 2016, 'A study of nurture groups as a window into school relationships', The International Journal of Nurture in Education, vol. 2, pp. 7-14. <https://issuu.com/nurturegroups/docs/the_international_journal_-_vol.2>

APA

Vancouver

Warin J, Hibbin RA. A study of nurture groups as a window into school relationships. The International Journal of Nurture in Education. 2016 Jan 4;2:7-14.

Author

Warin, Joanna ; Hibbin, Rebecca Alison. / A study of nurture groups as a window into school relationships. In: The International Journal of Nurture in Education. 2016 ; Vol. 2. pp. 7-14.

Bibtex

@article{932a9eb8a80d44678dbceea886587c57,
title = "A study of nurture groups as a window into school relationships",
abstract = "This narrative account describes approaches to sanctions in primary school settings that also provide Nurture Groups, and the ways in which different approaches may be viewed as helpful or harmful to children{\textquoteright}s behaviour and to Nurture Group provision. It draws from research conducted as part of a larger comparative Nurture Group study examining whole school aspects of NG provision in seven case study schools. The three most successful settings within the study had relationships at their core, and a de-emphasis on sanction systems. They had an ideological leaning away from any kind of {\textquoteleft}will to punish{\textquoteright}, and a leaning towards social relationships and Restorative Justice. In contrast the least successful settings tended towards social control and sanction systems that provided a sharp contrast between the contexts of nurture and mainstream. Overall it is concluded that in order to avoid harmful and counter-productive effects, sanctions in schools need to be individualised and they need to make sense. In addition, they need to be proportional, non-confrontational and educational. Under these conditions sanctions do not preclude social engagement or represent a punitive and reactionary response. However, it is therelational ecology of the school that dictates whether a punitive strategy of control, or anurturing strategy of ongoing social engagement is sought overall. Nurture Groups can provide us with a useful way to model complementary aspects of Restorative Justice, as both NG and RJ philosophies are based on a will to develop, maintain, repair and sustain attachments.",
author = "Joanna Warin and Hibbin, {Rebecca Alison}",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
day = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "7--14",
journal = "The International Journal of Nurture in Education",
issn = "2059-0458",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A study of nurture groups as a window into school relationships

AU - Warin, Joanna

AU - Hibbin, Rebecca Alison

PY - 2016/1/4

Y1 - 2016/1/4

N2 - This narrative account describes approaches to sanctions in primary school settings that also provide Nurture Groups, and the ways in which different approaches may be viewed as helpful or harmful to children’s behaviour and to Nurture Group provision. It draws from research conducted as part of a larger comparative Nurture Group study examining whole school aspects of NG provision in seven case study schools. The three most successful settings within the study had relationships at their core, and a de-emphasis on sanction systems. They had an ideological leaning away from any kind of ‘will to punish’, and a leaning towards social relationships and Restorative Justice. In contrast the least successful settings tended towards social control and sanction systems that provided a sharp contrast between the contexts of nurture and mainstream. Overall it is concluded that in order to avoid harmful and counter-productive effects, sanctions in schools need to be individualised and they need to make sense. In addition, they need to be proportional, non-confrontational and educational. Under these conditions sanctions do not preclude social engagement or represent a punitive and reactionary response. However, it is therelational ecology of the school that dictates whether a punitive strategy of control, or anurturing strategy of ongoing social engagement is sought overall. Nurture Groups can provide us with a useful way to model complementary aspects of Restorative Justice, as both NG and RJ philosophies are based on a will to develop, maintain, repair and sustain attachments.

AB - This narrative account describes approaches to sanctions in primary school settings that also provide Nurture Groups, and the ways in which different approaches may be viewed as helpful or harmful to children’s behaviour and to Nurture Group provision. It draws from research conducted as part of a larger comparative Nurture Group study examining whole school aspects of NG provision in seven case study schools. The three most successful settings within the study had relationships at their core, and a de-emphasis on sanction systems. They had an ideological leaning away from any kind of ‘will to punish’, and a leaning towards social relationships and Restorative Justice. In contrast the least successful settings tended towards social control and sanction systems that provided a sharp contrast between the contexts of nurture and mainstream. Overall it is concluded that in order to avoid harmful and counter-productive effects, sanctions in schools need to be individualised and they need to make sense. In addition, they need to be proportional, non-confrontational and educational. Under these conditions sanctions do not preclude social engagement or represent a punitive and reactionary response. However, it is therelational ecology of the school that dictates whether a punitive strategy of control, or anurturing strategy of ongoing social engagement is sought overall. Nurture Groups can provide us with a useful way to model complementary aspects of Restorative Justice, as both NG and RJ philosophies are based on a will to develop, maintain, repair and sustain attachments.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 7

EP - 14

JO - The International Journal of Nurture in Education

JF - The International Journal of Nurture in Education

SN - 2059-0458

ER -