Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A time and motion study of Screening, Brief Int...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A time and motion study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment implementation in health-care settings

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A time and motion study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment implementation in health-care settings. / Cowell, Alexander J.; Dowd, Bill; Landwehr, Justin et al.
In: Addiction (Abingdon, England), Vol. 112 , No. Suppl. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 65-72.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Cowell, AJ, Dowd, B, Landwehr, J, Barbosa, C & Bray, JW 2017, 'A time and motion study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment implementation in health-care settings', Addiction (Abingdon, England), vol. 112 , no. Suppl. 2, pp. 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13659

APA

Cowell, A. J., Dowd, B., Landwehr, J., Barbosa, C., & Bray, J. W. (2017). A time and motion study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment implementation in health-care settings. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 112 (Suppl. 2), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13659

Vancouver

Cowell AJ, Dowd B, Landwehr J, Barbosa C, Bray JW. A time and motion study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment implementation in health-care settings. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2017 Feb 1;112 (Suppl. 2):65-72. Epub 2017 Jan 10. doi: 10.1111/add.13659

Author

Cowell, Alexander J. ; Dowd, Bill ; Landwehr, Justin et al. / A time and motion study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment implementation in health-care settings. In: Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2017 ; Vol. 112 , No. Suppl. 2. pp. 65-72.

Bibtex

@article{74917e8616d04e31903e9a5a1296f6a7,
title = "A time and motion study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment implementation in health-care settings",
abstract = "AIMS:Screening and brief intervention for harmful substance use in medical settings is being promoted heavily in the United States. To justify service provision fiscally, the field needs accurate estimates of the number and type of staff required to provide services, and thus the time taken to perform activities used to deliver services. This study analyzed the time spent in activities for the component services of the substance misuse Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) program implemented in emergency departments, in-patient units and ambulatory clinics. DESIGN:Observers timed activities according to 18 distinct codes among SBIRT practitioners. SETTING:Twenty-six US sites within four grantees. PARTICIPANTS:Five hundred and one practitioner-patient interactions; 63 SBIRT practitioners. MEASUREMENTS:Timing of practitioner activities. INTERVENTIONS:Delivery of component services of SBIRT. FINDINGS:The mean (standard error) time to deliver services was 1:19 (0:06) for a pre-screen (n = 210), 4:28 (0:24) for a screen (n = 97) and 6:51 (0:38) for a brief intervention (n = 66). Estimates of service duration varied by setting. Overall, practitioners spent 40% of their time supporting SBIRT delivery to patients and 13% of their time delivering services. CONCLUSIONS:In the United States, support activities (e.g. reviewing the patient's chart, locating the patient, writing case-notes) for substance abuse Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment require more staff time than delivery of services. Support time for screens and brief interventions in the emergency department/trauma setting was high compared with the out-patient setting.",
keywords = "Alcohol, screening and brief intervention, substance misuse, time and motion study",
author = "Cowell, {Alexander J.} and Bill Dowd and Justin Landwehr and Carolina Barbosa and Bray, {Jeremy W.}",
year = "2017",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/add.13659",
language = "English",
volume = "112 ",
pages = "65--72",
journal = "Addiction (Abingdon, England)",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "Suppl. 2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A time and motion study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment implementation in health-care settings

AU - Cowell, Alexander J.

AU - Dowd, Bill

AU - Landwehr, Justin

AU - Barbosa, Carolina

AU - Bray, Jeremy W.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - AIMS:Screening and brief intervention for harmful substance use in medical settings is being promoted heavily in the United States. To justify service provision fiscally, the field needs accurate estimates of the number and type of staff required to provide services, and thus the time taken to perform activities used to deliver services. This study analyzed the time spent in activities for the component services of the substance misuse Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) program implemented in emergency departments, in-patient units and ambulatory clinics. DESIGN:Observers timed activities according to 18 distinct codes among SBIRT practitioners. SETTING:Twenty-six US sites within four grantees. PARTICIPANTS:Five hundred and one practitioner-patient interactions; 63 SBIRT practitioners. MEASUREMENTS:Timing of practitioner activities. INTERVENTIONS:Delivery of component services of SBIRT. FINDINGS:The mean (standard error) time to deliver services was 1:19 (0:06) for a pre-screen (n = 210), 4:28 (0:24) for a screen (n = 97) and 6:51 (0:38) for a brief intervention (n = 66). Estimates of service duration varied by setting. Overall, practitioners spent 40% of their time supporting SBIRT delivery to patients and 13% of their time delivering services. CONCLUSIONS:In the United States, support activities (e.g. reviewing the patient's chart, locating the patient, writing case-notes) for substance abuse Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment require more staff time than delivery of services. Support time for screens and brief interventions in the emergency department/trauma setting was high compared with the out-patient setting.

AB - AIMS:Screening and brief intervention for harmful substance use in medical settings is being promoted heavily in the United States. To justify service provision fiscally, the field needs accurate estimates of the number and type of staff required to provide services, and thus the time taken to perform activities used to deliver services. This study analyzed the time spent in activities for the component services of the substance misuse Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) program implemented in emergency departments, in-patient units and ambulatory clinics. DESIGN:Observers timed activities according to 18 distinct codes among SBIRT practitioners. SETTING:Twenty-six US sites within four grantees. PARTICIPANTS:Five hundred and one practitioner-patient interactions; 63 SBIRT practitioners. MEASUREMENTS:Timing of practitioner activities. INTERVENTIONS:Delivery of component services of SBIRT. FINDINGS:The mean (standard error) time to deliver services was 1:19 (0:06) for a pre-screen (n = 210), 4:28 (0:24) for a screen (n = 97) and 6:51 (0:38) for a brief intervention (n = 66). Estimates of service duration varied by setting. Overall, practitioners spent 40% of their time supporting SBIRT delivery to patients and 13% of their time delivering services. CONCLUSIONS:In the United States, support activities (e.g. reviewing the patient's chart, locating the patient, writing case-notes) for substance abuse Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment require more staff time than delivery of services. Support time for screens and brief interventions in the emergency department/trauma setting was high compared with the out-patient setting.

KW - Alcohol

KW - screening and brief intervention

KW - substance misuse

KW - time and motion study

U2 - 10.1111/add.13659

DO - 10.1111/add.13659

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28074563

VL - 112

SP - 65

EP - 72

JO - Addiction (Abingdon, England)

JF - Addiction (Abingdon, England)

IS - Suppl. 2

ER -