Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Accelerating the development of a psychological...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Accelerating the development of a psychological intervention to restore treatment decision-making capacity in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder: An umbrella trial

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print
  • Paul Hutton
  • Christopher D J Taylor
  • Richard Emsley
  • Anvita Vikram
  • Candy Ho Alexander
  • Andrea McCann
  • David Saddington
  • Emma Eliasson
  • Joseph Burke
  • Sean Harper
  • Thanos Karatzias
  • Peter J Taylor
  • Andrew Watson
  • Nadine Dougall
  • Jill Stavert
  • Suzanne O'Rourke
  • Angela Glasgow
  • Regina Murphy
  • Karen Palmer
  • Nosheen Zaidi
  • Polly Bidwell
  • Jemma Pritchard
  • Lucy Carr
  • Amanda Woodrow
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/08/2025
<mark>Journal</mark>Schizophrenia research
Volume282
Number of pages14
Pages (from-to)184-197
Publication StatusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date3/07/25
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder ('psychosis') lack capacity to make decisions about psychiatric treatment ('incapacity'), however we lack robust evidence from clinical trials on interventions to improve it. To accelerate their development, we tested whether an 'umbrella' trial was feasible. This involved running multiple randomised controlled 'interventionist-causal' trials (IC-RCTs) concurrently. Each tested the effect on incapacity of targeting an individual psychological mechanism.

METHODS: We did 3 assessor-blind, multi-site, pilot IC-RCTs. Each compared 6 sessions of psychological therapy for either self-stigma (SS), low self-esteem (SE) or the jumping-to-conclusions (JTC) bias, to 6 sessions of collaborative assessment of the causes of incapacity (control). Adults with psychosis, incapacity and ≥1 target mechanism could participate. Primary outcomes were recruitment feasibility, and data retention on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Treatment (MacCAT-T).

RESULTS: We recruited 57 participants and performed 60 randomisations (3 patients participated in 2 trials); 82 % provided post-treatment data. Standardised mean differences (Hedges' g) for MacCAT-T 'understanding' were g = 0.35 (SS; 95 % CI -0.51, 1.22), g = 0.41 (JTC; -0.55, 1.38) and g = 0.74 (SE; -0.73, 2.21), with positive values favouring treatment. For 'reasoning', they were -0.20 (SS; -1.05, 0.66), 0.79 (JTC; -0.20, 1.79) and 0.79 (SE -0.69, 2.27). For 'appreciation' they were -0.39 (SS; -1.25, 0.48), 1.76 (JTC; 0.62, 2.90) and 0.57 (SE; -0.87, 2.02). Four control participants had 9 serious adverse events between randomisation and post-treatment; two intervention participants had 2.

DISCUSSION: An umbrella trial of psychological interventions to improve capacity in psychosis is feasible. A definitive trial is warranted.

TRIAL PRE-REGISTRATION: NCT04309435.