Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Acceptability of a novel suicide prevention psy...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Acceptability of a novel suicide prevention psychological therapy for people who experience non‐affective psychosis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Acceptability of a novel suicide prevention psychological therapy for people who experience non‐affective psychosis. / Harris, Kamelia; Gooding, Patricia A.; Awenat, Yvonne et al.
In: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, Vol. 96, No. 3, 30.09.2023, p. 560-576.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Harris, K, Gooding, PA, Awenat, Y, Haddock, G, Cook, L, Huggett, C, Jones, S, Lobban, F, Peeney, E, Pratt, D & Peters, S 2023, 'Acceptability of a novel suicide prevention psychological therapy for people who experience non‐affective psychosis', Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 560-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12456

APA

Harris, K., Gooding, P. A., Awenat, Y., Haddock, G., Cook, L., Huggett, C., Jones, S., Lobban, F., Peeney, E., Pratt, D., & Peters, S. (2023). Acceptability of a novel suicide prevention psychological therapy for people who experience non‐affective psychosis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 96(3), 560-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12456

Vancouver

Harris K, Gooding PA, Awenat Y, Haddock G, Cook L, Huggett C et al. Acceptability of a novel suicide prevention psychological therapy for people who experience non‐affective psychosis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2023 Sept 30;96(3):560-576. Epub 2023 Mar 1. doi: 10.1111/papt.12456

Author

Harris, Kamelia ; Gooding, Patricia A. ; Awenat, Yvonne et al. / Acceptability of a novel suicide prevention psychological therapy for people who experience non‐affective psychosis. In: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2023 ; Vol. 96, No. 3. pp. 560-576.

Bibtex

@article{b3a46516daef454e82bd8ca4e55b6074,
title = "Acceptability of a novel suicide prevention psychological therapy for people who experience non‐affective psychosis",
abstract = "AbstractObjectivesSuicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. People experiencing psychosis are at increased risk of death by suicide. Talking therapies can alleviate suicidal thoughts, plans, and attempts. Therapies need to also be acceptable to recipients. The aim of this study was to investigate the views on psychological therapy for people experiencing psychosis and suicidality using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.DesignQualitative interview study.MethodsParticipants were recruited from a randomised controlled trial comparing suicide prevention psychological therapy with treatment as usual. Individuals had a diagnosis of non‐affective psychosis and experience of suicidal thoughts, plans and/or attempts. To assess the acceptability of the therapy, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants randomised to receive therapy. Data were deductively analysed using an adaptation of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.ResultsInterviews (Mean = 45 min) were conducted and audio recorded with 21 participants. Data were organised into six themes: 1. Affective attitude, 2. Burden, 3. Alliance, 4. Intervention coherence, 5. Perceived effectiveness, and 6. Self‐efficacy. There was no evidence of issues relating to domains of ethicality and opportunity costs associated with receiving therapy.ConclusionsTalking about suicide was difficult and, at times, distressing, but it was perceived to be useful for understanding experiences. To be acceptable, it is important for therapists to ensure that clients' understanding of therapy aligns with expectations of effectiveness and to invest in building strong therapeutic alliances. Future research will benefit from examining therapists' experiences of delivering therapy through different modes (e.g. online, telephone).",
keywords = "acceptability, Cognitive behavioural therapy, intervention, psychological therapy, psychosis, qualitative study, suicidality, suicide",
author = "Kamelia Harris and Gooding, {Patricia A.} and Yvonne Awenat and Gillian Haddock and Leanne Cook and Charlotte Huggett and Steven Jones and Fiona Lobban and Ellen Peeney and Daniel Pratt and Sarah Peters",
year = "2023",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/papt.12456",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "560--576",
journal = "Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice",
issn = "1476-0835",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability of a novel suicide prevention psychological therapy for people who experience non‐affective psychosis

AU - Harris, Kamelia

AU - Gooding, Patricia A.

AU - Awenat, Yvonne

AU - Haddock, Gillian

AU - Cook, Leanne

AU - Huggett, Charlotte

AU - Jones, Steven

AU - Lobban, Fiona

AU - Peeney, Ellen

AU - Pratt, Daniel

AU - Peters, Sarah

PY - 2023/9/30

Y1 - 2023/9/30

N2 - AbstractObjectivesSuicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. People experiencing psychosis are at increased risk of death by suicide. Talking therapies can alleviate suicidal thoughts, plans, and attempts. Therapies need to also be acceptable to recipients. The aim of this study was to investigate the views on psychological therapy for people experiencing psychosis and suicidality using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.DesignQualitative interview study.MethodsParticipants were recruited from a randomised controlled trial comparing suicide prevention psychological therapy with treatment as usual. Individuals had a diagnosis of non‐affective psychosis and experience of suicidal thoughts, plans and/or attempts. To assess the acceptability of the therapy, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants randomised to receive therapy. Data were deductively analysed using an adaptation of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.ResultsInterviews (Mean = 45 min) were conducted and audio recorded with 21 participants. Data were organised into six themes: 1. Affective attitude, 2. Burden, 3. Alliance, 4. Intervention coherence, 5. Perceived effectiveness, and 6. Self‐efficacy. There was no evidence of issues relating to domains of ethicality and opportunity costs associated with receiving therapy.ConclusionsTalking about suicide was difficult and, at times, distressing, but it was perceived to be useful for understanding experiences. To be acceptable, it is important for therapists to ensure that clients' understanding of therapy aligns with expectations of effectiveness and to invest in building strong therapeutic alliances. Future research will benefit from examining therapists' experiences of delivering therapy through different modes (e.g. online, telephone).

AB - AbstractObjectivesSuicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. People experiencing psychosis are at increased risk of death by suicide. Talking therapies can alleviate suicidal thoughts, plans, and attempts. Therapies need to also be acceptable to recipients. The aim of this study was to investigate the views on psychological therapy for people experiencing psychosis and suicidality using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.DesignQualitative interview study.MethodsParticipants were recruited from a randomised controlled trial comparing suicide prevention psychological therapy with treatment as usual. Individuals had a diagnosis of non‐affective psychosis and experience of suicidal thoughts, plans and/or attempts. To assess the acceptability of the therapy, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants randomised to receive therapy. Data were deductively analysed using an adaptation of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.ResultsInterviews (Mean = 45 min) were conducted and audio recorded with 21 participants. Data were organised into six themes: 1. Affective attitude, 2. Burden, 3. Alliance, 4. Intervention coherence, 5. Perceived effectiveness, and 6. Self‐efficacy. There was no evidence of issues relating to domains of ethicality and opportunity costs associated with receiving therapy.ConclusionsTalking about suicide was difficult and, at times, distressing, but it was perceived to be useful for understanding experiences. To be acceptable, it is important for therapists to ensure that clients' understanding of therapy aligns with expectations of effectiveness and to invest in building strong therapeutic alliances. Future research will benefit from examining therapists' experiences of delivering therapy through different modes (e.g. online, telephone).

KW - acceptability

KW - Cognitive behavioural therapy

KW - intervention

KW - psychological therapy

KW - psychosis

KW - qualitative study

KW - suicidality

KW - suicide

U2 - 10.1111/papt.12456

DO - 10.1111/papt.12456

M3 - Journal article

VL - 96

SP - 560

EP - 576

JO - Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

JF - Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

SN - 1476-0835

IS - 3

ER -