Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Access to medicines versus protection of 'inves...
View graph of relations

Access to medicines versus protection of 'investments' in intellectual property: Reconciliation through interpretation?

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Access to medicines versus protection of 'investments' in intellectual property: Reconciliation through interpretation? / Vadi, Valentina Sara.
Law in the Pursuit of Development: Principles into Practice?. ed. / Amanda Kessaris. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2009. p. 52-67.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Vadi, VS 2009, Access to medicines versus protection of 'investments' in intellectual property: Reconciliation through interpretation? in A Kessaris (ed.), Law in the Pursuit of Development: Principles into Practice?. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 52-67. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863527

APA

Vadi, V. S. (2009). Access to medicines versus protection of 'investments' in intellectual property: Reconciliation through interpretation? In A. Kessaris (Ed.), Law in the Pursuit of Development: Principles into Practice? (pp. 52-67). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863527

Vancouver

Vadi VS. Access to medicines versus protection of 'investments' in intellectual property: Reconciliation through interpretation? In Kessaris A, editor, Law in the Pursuit of Development: Principles into Practice?. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 2009. p. 52-67 doi: 10.4324/9780203863527

Author

Vadi, Valentina Sara. / Access to medicines versus protection of 'investments' in intellectual property : Reconciliation through interpretation?. Law in the Pursuit of Development: Principles into Practice?. editor / Amanda Kessaris. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2009. pp. 52-67

Bibtex

@inbook{f4613f1d88c04f74836df6dd17d8576d,
title = "Access to medicines versus protection of 'investments' in intellectual property: Reconciliation through interpretation?",
abstract = "Intellectual property (IP) is a policy device aimed at promoting inventiveness and public welfare. By giving creators exclusive rights to their creations, it provides an incentive for inventors both to invent and to disclose the fruits of their inventiveness. This dual function is captured in Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966; hereinafter ICESCR), which identifies the need to protect both public and private interests in knowledge creation and diffusion (see also Macmillan in this volume). As the economic pillar of the post-industrial society, intellectual property playsa fundamental role in international relations, and recent developments in international law reflect this socio-economic role (Vadi 2008a). Intellectual property rights have become stronger than ever since the inception of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994; hereinafter TRIPS Agreement) under the aegis of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In recent years, states have added another layer of protection to intellectual property rights by signing all-encompassing investment treaties. Besides providing extensive protection for investors{\textquoteright} rights, investment agreements offer foreign investors direct access to arbitration against a host state. Crucially, this option opens the door to challenging national regulation that allegedly infringes investors{\textquoteright} rights. This chapter is concerned with the combined impact of intellectual propertyrights and investment agreements upon access to medicines. It first defines the notion of access to medicines. It then explores the interplay between intellectual property and access to medicines in investment law using recent case law. Finally some proposals are put forward in the attempt to reconcile investors{\textquoteright} rights with public health in international investment law.",
author = "Vadi, {Valentina Sara}",
year = "2009",
month = dec,
day = "14",
doi = "10.4324/9780203863527",
language = "English",
isbn = "0203863526",
pages = "52--67",
editor = "Kessaris, {Amanda }",
booktitle = "Law in the Pursuit of Development",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Access to medicines versus protection of 'investments' in intellectual property

T2 - Reconciliation through interpretation?

AU - Vadi, Valentina Sara

PY - 2009/12/14

Y1 - 2009/12/14

N2 - Intellectual property (IP) is a policy device aimed at promoting inventiveness and public welfare. By giving creators exclusive rights to their creations, it provides an incentive for inventors both to invent and to disclose the fruits of their inventiveness. This dual function is captured in Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966; hereinafter ICESCR), which identifies the need to protect both public and private interests in knowledge creation and diffusion (see also Macmillan in this volume). As the economic pillar of the post-industrial society, intellectual property playsa fundamental role in international relations, and recent developments in international law reflect this socio-economic role (Vadi 2008a). Intellectual property rights have become stronger than ever since the inception of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994; hereinafter TRIPS Agreement) under the aegis of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In recent years, states have added another layer of protection to intellectual property rights by signing all-encompassing investment treaties. Besides providing extensive protection for investors’ rights, investment agreements offer foreign investors direct access to arbitration against a host state. Crucially, this option opens the door to challenging national regulation that allegedly infringes investors’ rights. This chapter is concerned with the combined impact of intellectual propertyrights and investment agreements upon access to medicines. It first defines the notion of access to medicines. It then explores the interplay between intellectual property and access to medicines in investment law using recent case law. Finally some proposals are put forward in the attempt to reconcile investors’ rights with public health in international investment law.

AB - Intellectual property (IP) is a policy device aimed at promoting inventiveness and public welfare. By giving creators exclusive rights to their creations, it provides an incentive for inventors both to invent and to disclose the fruits of their inventiveness. This dual function is captured in Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966; hereinafter ICESCR), which identifies the need to protect both public and private interests in knowledge creation and diffusion (see also Macmillan in this volume). As the economic pillar of the post-industrial society, intellectual property playsa fundamental role in international relations, and recent developments in international law reflect this socio-economic role (Vadi 2008a). Intellectual property rights have become stronger than ever since the inception of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994; hereinafter TRIPS Agreement) under the aegis of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In recent years, states have added another layer of protection to intellectual property rights by signing all-encompassing investment treaties. Besides providing extensive protection for investors’ rights, investment agreements offer foreign investors direct access to arbitration against a host state. Crucially, this option opens the door to challenging national regulation that allegedly infringes investors’ rights. This chapter is concerned with the combined impact of intellectual propertyrights and investment agreements upon access to medicines. It first defines the notion of access to medicines. It then explores the interplay between intellectual property and access to medicines in investment law using recent case law. Finally some proposals are put forward in the attempt to reconcile investors’ rights with public health in international investment law.

U2 - 10.4324/9780203863527

DO - 10.4324/9780203863527

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84911013250

SN - 0203863526

SN - 9780203863527

SP - 52

EP - 67

BT - Law in the Pursuit of Development

A2 - Kessaris, Amanda

PB - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

ER -