Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Accomplishing an adaptive clinical trial for ca...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Accomplishing an adaptive clinical trial for cancer: Valuation practices and care work across the laboratory and the clinic

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Accomplishing an adaptive clinical trial for cancer: Valuation practices and care work across the laboratory and the clinic. / Swallow, Julia; Kerr, Anne; Chekar, Choon Key et al.
In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 252, 112949, 31.05.2020.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Swallow J, Kerr A, Chekar CK, Cunningham-Burley S. Accomplishing an adaptive clinical trial for cancer: Valuation practices and care work across the laboratory and the clinic. Social Science and Medicine. 2020 May 31;252:112949. Epub 2020 Mar 24. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112949

Author

Bibtex

@article{db203de6e58d45b0a09720da7a13e294,
title = "Accomplishing an adaptive clinical trial for cancer: Valuation practices and care work across the laboratory and the clinic",
abstract = "A new generation of adaptive, multi-arm clinical trials has been developed in cancer research including those offering experimental treatments to patients based on the genomic analysis of their cancer. Depending on the molecular changes found in patients' cancer cells, it is anticipated that targeted and personalised therapies will be made available for those who have reached the end of standard treatment options, potentially extending survival time. Results from these trials are also expected to advance genomic knowledge for patients in the future. Drawing on data from a qualitative study of one such trial in the UK, comprising observations of out-patient clinic appointments, out-patient biopsy procedures, laboratory work, and interviews with practitioners, this paper explores how the clinical and research value of one such trial was accomplished in everyday practice by focussing on the work of clinical trials and laboratory staff across recruitment, laboratory analysis, and results management. In the face of numerous potential set-backs, disappointments and failure, we explore how practitioners worked to balance the need to meet established measures of value such as numbers of patients recruited into the trial, alongside cultivating the value of positive affects for patients by managing their expectations and emotions. This care work was performed primarily by practitioners whose roles have historically been devalued in healthcare practice and yet, as we show, were critical to this process. We conclude by arguing that as complex multi-arm adaptive trials become more commonplace, we need to attend to, and render visible, the dynamic and care-full valuation practices of backstage practitioners through which experimental biomedicine is accomplished, and in doing so show that care both achieves clinical and research value, and is also a series of practices and processes that tends to tissue, patients and staff in the context of ever-present possibility of failure.",
keywords = "Adaptive Clinical Trials as Topic, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Laboratories, Male, Neoplasms/therapy, Qualitative Research",
author = "Julia Swallow and Anne Kerr and Chekar, {Choon Key} and Sarah Cunningham-Burley",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = may,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112949",
language = "English",
volume = "252",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accomplishing an adaptive clinical trial for cancer

T2 - Valuation practices and care work across the laboratory and the clinic

AU - Swallow, Julia

AU - Kerr, Anne

AU - Chekar, Choon Key

AU - Cunningham-Burley, Sarah

N1 - Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/5/31

Y1 - 2020/5/31

N2 - A new generation of adaptive, multi-arm clinical trials has been developed in cancer research including those offering experimental treatments to patients based on the genomic analysis of their cancer. Depending on the molecular changes found in patients' cancer cells, it is anticipated that targeted and personalised therapies will be made available for those who have reached the end of standard treatment options, potentially extending survival time. Results from these trials are also expected to advance genomic knowledge for patients in the future. Drawing on data from a qualitative study of one such trial in the UK, comprising observations of out-patient clinic appointments, out-patient biopsy procedures, laboratory work, and interviews with practitioners, this paper explores how the clinical and research value of one such trial was accomplished in everyday practice by focussing on the work of clinical trials and laboratory staff across recruitment, laboratory analysis, and results management. In the face of numerous potential set-backs, disappointments and failure, we explore how practitioners worked to balance the need to meet established measures of value such as numbers of patients recruited into the trial, alongside cultivating the value of positive affects for patients by managing their expectations and emotions. This care work was performed primarily by practitioners whose roles have historically been devalued in healthcare practice and yet, as we show, were critical to this process. We conclude by arguing that as complex multi-arm adaptive trials become more commonplace, we need to attend to, and render visible, the dynamic and care-full valuation practices of backstage practitioners through which experimental biomedicine is accomplished, and in doing so show that care both achieves clinical and research value, and is also a series of practices and processes that tends to tissue, patients and staff in the context of ever-present possibility of failure.

AB - A new generation of adaptive, multi-arm clinical trials has been developed in cancer research including those offering experimental treatments to patients based on the genomic analysis of their cancer. Depending on the molecular changes found in patients' cancer cells, it is anticipated that targeted and personalised therapies will be made available for those who have reached the end of standard treatment options, potentially extending survival time. Results from these trials are also expected to advance genomic knowledge for patients in the future. Drawing on data from a qualitative study of one such trial in the UK, comprising observations of out-patient clinic appointments, out-patient biopsy procedures, laboratory work, and interviews with practitioners, this paper explores how the clinical and research value of one such trial was accomplished in everyday practice by focussing on the work of clinical trials and laboratory staff across recruitment, laboratory analysis, and results management. In the face of numerous potential set-backs, disappointments and failure, we explore how practitioners worked to balance the need to meet established measures of value such as numbers of patients recruited into the trial, alongside cultivating the value of positive affects for patients by managing their expectations and emotions. This care work was performed primarily by practitioners whose roles have historically been devalued in healthcare practice and yet, as we show, were critical to this process. We conclude by arguing that as complex multi-arm adaptive trials become more commonplace, we need to attend to, and render visible, the dynamic and care-full valuation practices of backstage practitioners through which experimental biomedicine is accomplished, and in doing so show that care both achieves clinical and research value, and is also a series of practices and processes that tends to tissue, patients and staff in the context of ever-present possibility of failure.

KW - Adaptive Clinical Trials as Topic

KW - Delivery of Health Care

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Laboratories

KW - Male

KW - Neoplasms/therapy

KW - Qualitative Research

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112949

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112949

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32278242

VL - 252

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

M1 - 112949

ER -