Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Actions versus Words

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Actions versus Words: Exploring the contributions of working memory and motoric coding in children's instruction following using a dual‐task paradigm

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Actions versus Words: Exploring the contributions of working memory and motoric coding in children's instruction following using a dual‐task paradigm. / Makri, Angie; Fiske, Abigail.
In: British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 4, 30.11.2023, p. 400-411.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Makri A, Fiske A. Actions versus Words: Exploring the contributions of working memory and motoric coding in children's instruction following using a dual‐task paradigm. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2023 Nov 30;41(4):400-411. Epub 2023 Aug 31. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12461

Author

Bibtex

@article{0caf4ccdd2d34ffca982aaf1cf082993,
title = "Actions versus Words: Exploring the contributions of working memory and motoric coding in children's instruction following using a dual‐task paradigm",
abstract = "Previous research in adults has showed that physical performance (i.e., enactment) of instructions at recall leads to better memory compared to verbal recall and that this effect does not rely solely on Working Memory resources. The current study aimed to replicate this finding in children. A group of 32 children encoded simple instructions verbally while engaging in a series of distractor tasks (articulatory suppression, backwards counting and a motor suppression task). Participants recalled information verbally or physically through enactment. The findings showed that although distractors impaired performance compared to a control condition (no distractor task), the enactment advantage remained intact in all conditions. These findings show that children's memory is superior when they perform, rather than when they verbally repeat instructions and crucially it is suggested that this effect does not rely solely on Working Memory resources.",
author = "Angie Makri and Abigail Fiske",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/bjdp.12461",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "400--411",
journal = "British Journal of Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0261-510X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Actions versus Words

T2 - Exploring the contributions of working memory and motoric coding in children's instruction following using a dual‐task paradigm

AU - Makri, Angie

AU - Fiske, Abigail

PY - 2023/11/30

Y1 - 2023/11/30

N2 - Previous research in adults has showed that physical performance (i.e., enactment) of instructions at recall leads to better memory compared to verbal recall and that this effect does not rely solely on Working Memory resources. The current study aimed to replicate this finding in children. A group of 32 children encoded simple instructions verbally while engaging in a series of distractor tasks (articulatory suppression, backwards counting and a motor suppression task). Participants recalled information verbally or physically through enactment. The findings showed that although distractors impaired performance compared to a control condition (no distractor task), the enactment advantage remained intact in all conditions. These findings show that children's memory is superior when they perform, rather than when they verbally repeat instructions and crucially it is suggested that this effect does not rely solely on Working Memory resources.

AB - Previous research in adults has showed that physical performance (i.e., enactment) of instructions at recall leads to better memory compared to verbal recall and that this effect does not rely solely on Working Memory resources. The current study aimed to replicate this finding in children. A group of 32 children encoded simple instructions verbally while engaging in a series of distractor tasks (articulatory suppression, backwards counting and a motor suppression task). Participants recalled information verbally or physically through enactment. The findings showed that although distractors impaired performance compared to a control condition (no distractor task), the enactment advantage remained intact in all conditions. These findings show that children's memory is superior when they perform, rather than when they verbally repeat instructions and crucially it is suggested that this effect does not rely solely on Working Memory resources.

U2 - 10.1111/bjdp.12461

DO - 10.1111/bjdp.12461

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 400

EP - 411

JO - British Journal of Developmental Psychology

JF - British Journal of Developmental Psychology

SN - 0261-510X

IS - 4

ER -