Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Adapting research activity
View graph of relations

Adapting research activity

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Adapting research activity. / till, Jeremy; Mottram, Judith; Rust, Chris.

In: Architectural Research Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.01.2005, p. 103-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

till, J, Mottram, J & Rust, C 2005, 'Adapting research activity', Architectural Research Quarterly, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 103-104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135913550500014X

APA

till, J., Mottram, J., & Rust, C. (2005). Adapting research activity. Architectural Research Quarterly, 9(2), 103-104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135913550500014X

Vancouver

till J, Mottram J, Rust C. Adapting research activity. Architectural Research Quarterly. 2005 Jan 1;9(2):103-104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135913550500014X

Author

till, Jeremy ; Mottram, Judith ; Rust, Chris. / Adapting research activity. In: Architectural Research Quarterly. 2005 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 103-104.

Bibtex

@article{1d862e36fcd6472e9d3cf4f58c2ede08,
title = "Adapting research activity",
abstract = "In 2005 the Arts and Humanities Research Council initiated a review of practice-led research in art, design and architecture. The purpose of the review was to develop a {\textquoteleft}comprehensive map of recent and current research activity in the area{\textquoteright}. What quickly became obvious to the team that won the bid to run the review (led by the three authors) was that to map activity one first had to attempt to define it. The term {\textquoteleft}practice-led research{\textquoteright} means many different things to different people and so immediately raises debate. The positions range from those who believe that the act of making or designing alone constitutes research, to those who believe that research (as analytical activity) is incommensurable with design (as synthetic activity). For the former, the knowledge contained within the artefact is self-evident and beyond the need for additional explication; for the latter, knowledge resides outside the artefact and in the realm of its dissemination and interpretation. The importance of the AHRC review is not that it will settle these arguments, but that it will provide a much firmer context in which to place them.",
author = "Jeremy till and Judith Mottram and Chris Rust",
year = "2005",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S135913550500014X",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "103--104",
journal = "arq: Architecture Research Quarterly",
issn = "1359-1355",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adapting research activity

AU - till, Jeremy

AU - Mottram, Judith

AU - Rust, Chris

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - In 2005 the Arts and Humanities Research Council initiated a review of practice-led research in art, design and architecture. The purpose of the review was to develop a ‘comprehensive map of recent and current research activity in the area’. What quickly became obvious to the team that won the bid to run the review (led by the three authors) was that to map activity one first had to attempt to define it. The term ‘practice-led research’ means many different things to different people and so immediately raises debate. The positions range from those who believe that the act of making or designing alone constitutes research, to those who believe that research (as analytical activity) is incommensurable with design (as synthetic activity). For the former, the knowledge contained within the artefact is self-evident and beyond the need for additional explication; for the latter, knowledge resides outside the artefact and in the realm of its dissemination and interpretation. The importance of the AHRC review is not that it will settle these arguments, but that it will provide a much firmer context in which to place them.

AB - In 2005 the Arts and Humanities Research Council initiated a review of practice-led research in art, design and architecture. The purpose of the review was to develop a ‘comprehensive map of recent and current research activity in the area’. What quickly became obvious to the team that won the bid to run the review (led by the three authors) was that to map activity one first had to attempt to define it. The term ‘practice-led research’ means many different things to different people and so immediately raises debate. The positions range from those who believe that the act of making or designing alone constitutes research, to those who believe that research (as analytical activity) is incommensurable with design (as synthetic activity). For the former, the knowledge contained within the artefact is self-evident and beyond the need for additional explication; for the latter, knowledge resides outside the artefact and in the realm of its dissemination and interpretation. The importance of the AHRC review is not that it will settle these arguments, but that it will provide a much firmer context in which to place them.

U2 - 10.1017/S135913550500014X

DO - 10.1017/S135913550500014X

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85008542653

VL - 9

SP - 103

EP - 104

JO - arq: Architecture Research Quarterly

JF - arq: Architecture Research Quarterly

SN - 1359-1355

IS - 2

ER -