Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Addressing gender in energy studies

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Addressing gender in energy studies

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Addressing gender in energy studies. / Fathallah, J.; Pyakurel, P.
In: Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 65, 101461, 31.07.2020.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Fathallah, J & Pyakurel, P 2020, 'Addressing gender in energy studies', Energy Research and Social Science, vol. 65, 101461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101461

APA

Fathallah, J., & Pyakurel, P. (2020). Addressing gender in energy studies. Energy Research and Social Science, 65, Article 101461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101461

Vancouver

Fathallah J, Pyakurel P. Addressing gender in energy studies. Energy Research and Social Science. 2020 Jul 31;65:101461. Epub 2020 Feb 25. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101461

Author

Fathallah, J. ; Pyakurel, P. / Addressing gender in energy studies. In: Energy Research and Social Science. 2020 ; Vol. 65.

Bibtex

@article{1d1d3b8ccd9d4f49a02198c259cc0934,
title = "Addressing gender in energy studies",
abstract = "Although there are several studies on energy and gender, most of the studies have conflated {\textquoteleft}sex{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}gender{\textquoteright} and there are some inconsistent and imprecise uses of these terms in energy and gender studies. In this article, we explore some differences between {\textquoteleft}sex{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}gender{\textquoteright} from a Global North perspective based on current gender theory that can be helpful to ensure that these terms are used more consistently and precisely when conducting energy and gender studies. We contend that most of the existing gender and energy studies are often inadequate in that they only address energy and a biological conception of sex, or else simplistically equate gender with a masculine/feminine binary that may actually reinforce essentializing gender myths. Thus, we highlight an important gap in energy and gender research and propose a conceptual approach to precisely and consistently utilize the terms {\textquoteleft}sex{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}energy{\textquoteright}. Furthermore, we emphasize the need of considering gender impacts while devising energy policies and set out research agenda to make energy and gender studies more rigorous. This study is focused on the Global North, and similar studies are also needed for Global South.",
keywords = "Energy and gender, Gender theory, Energy policy, Energy and sex",
author = "J. Fathallah and P. Pyakurel",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2020.101461",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
journal = "Energy Research and Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing gender in energy studies

AU - Fathallah, J.

AU - Pyakurel, P.

PY - 2020/7/31

Y1 - 2020/7/31

N2 - Although there are several studies on energy and gender, most of the studies have conflated ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ and there are some inconsistent and imprecise uses of these terms in energy and gender studies. In this article, we explore some differences between ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ from a Global North perspective based on current gender theory that can be helpful to ensure that these terms are used more consistently and precisely when conducting energy and gender studies. We contend that most of the existing gender and energy studies are often inadequate in that they only address energy and a biological conception of sex, or else simplistically equate gender with a masculine/feminine binary that may actually reinforce essentializing gender myths. Thus, we highlight an important gap in energy and gender research and propose a conceptual approach to precisely and consistently utilize the terms ‘sex’ and ‘energy’. Furthermore, we emphasize the need of considering gender impacts while devising energy policies and set out research agenda to make energy and gender studies more rigorous. This study is focused on the Global North, and similar studies are also needed for Global South.

AB - Although there are several studies on energy and gender, most of the studies have conflated ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ and there are some inconsistent and imprecise uses of these terms in energy and gender studies. In this article, we explore some differences between ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ from a Global North perspective based on current gender theory that can be helpful to ensure that these terms are used more consistently and precisely when conducting energy and gender studies. We contend that most of the existing gender and energy studies are often inadequate in that they only address energy and a biological conception of sex, or else simplistically equate gender with a masculine/feminine binary that may actually reinforce essentializing gender myths. Thus, we highlight an important gap in energy and gender research and propose a conceptual approach to precisely and consistently utilize the terms ‘sex’ and ‘energy’. Furthermore, we emphasize the need of considering gender impacts while devising energy policies and set out research agenda to make energy and gender studies more rigorous. This study is focused on the Global North, and similar studies are also needed for Global South.

KW - Energy and gender

KW - Gender theory

KW - Energy policy

KW - Energy and sex

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101461

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101461

M3 - Journal article

VL - 65

JO - Energy Research and Social Science

JF - Energy Research and Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

M1 - 101461

ER -