Accepted author manuscript, 91.1 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Comment/debate › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Comment/debate › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing ethics review practices in AI research
AU - Srikumar, M.
AU - Finlay, R.
AU - Abuhamad, G.
AU - Ashurst, C.
AU - Campbell, R.
AU - Campbell-Ratcliffe, E.
AU - Hongo, H.
AU - Jordan, S.R.
AU - Lindley, J.
AU - Ovadya, A.
AU - Pineau, J.
PY - 2022/12/22
Y1 - 2022/12/22
N2 - The implementation of ethics review processes is an important first step for anticipating and mitigating the potential harms of AI research. Its long-term success, however, requires a coordinated community effort, to support experimentation with different ethics review processes, to study their effect, and to provide opportunities for diverse voices from the community to share insights and foster norms.
AB - The implementation of ethics review processes is an important first step for anticipating and mitigating the potential harms of AI research. Its long-term success, however, requires a coordinated community effort, to support experimentation with different ethics review processes, to study their effect, and to provide opportunities for diverse voices from the community to share insights and foster norms.
U2 - 10.1038/s42256-022-00585-2
DO - 10.1038/s42256-022-00585-2
M3 - Comment/debate
VL - 4
SP - 1061
EP - 1064
JO - Nature Machine Intelligence
JF - Nature Machine Intelligence
SN - 2522-5839
IS - 12
ER -