Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Advancing literature review methodology through...

Electronic data

  • IJMR_Editorial_Review_Method_2022_AAM

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Fan, D., Breslin, D., Callahan, J.L., Iszatt-White, M. (2022) Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24: 171– 180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12291 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12291. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 410 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/04/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>International Journal of Management Reviews
Issue number2
Volume24
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)171-180
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date27/01/22
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) is proud to offer a special section for articles that address methods and methodologies associated with undertaking literature reviews. In this editorial, we share our goals and aspirations for this special section. Drawing upon the motivations and objectives set out in 2020 and 2021 IJMR editorials, this editorial first discusses what potential benefits such an ongoing special section can bring to management and organization research in the longer term. In the next two sections, we detail what editors expect to see in the submissions we receive, and we also elaborate on some general and specific publication criteria as to how editors and reviewers will assess submissions related to methodology discussion. We hope this editorial will help authors avoid the disappointment of a rejection and encourage them to develop rigorous, innovative and impactful methodological advances and discussion.

Bibliographic note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Fan, D., Breslin, D., Callahan, J.L., Iszatt-White, M. (2022) Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24: 171– 180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12291 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12291. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.