Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > After Doha

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

After Doha: what has climate change policy accomplished?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

After Doha: what has climate change policy accomplished? / Campbell, David.
In: Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 25, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 125-136.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Campbell, D 2013, 'After Doha: what has climate change policy accomplished?', Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqt001

APA

Vancouver

Campbell D. After Doha: what has climate change policy accomplished? Journal of Environmental Law. 2013 Mar;25(1):125-136. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqt001

Author

Campbell, David. / After Doha : what has climate change policy accomplished?. In: Journal of Environmental Law. 2013 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 125-136.

Bibtex

@article{de0ad08b610c463f985fef4a0f72e8f6,
title = "After Doha: what has climate change policy accomplished?",
abstract = "At the end of the Doha Climate Change Conference and of the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol, it is incontrovertible that 20 years of international climate change policy has failed to secure a reduction in global emissions. Bringing up to date an argument first made in 2007, this note explains this failure as a result of the legal position established by those negotiations. Contrary to general belief, it is not the case that no legally binding agreement over emissions has been established. One has been established, but it has been to grant to the major industrialising countries a permission to emit as much as they wish. The emissions of these countries have never been capped, and the operation of the Clean Development Mechanism, which, by the nature of its design, logically cannot prevent a growth of emissions, has been a failure. The increase of major industrialising countries{\textquoteright} emissions has made the policy of mitigating growth of global emissions impossible from the start and makes it impossible now.",
author = "David Campbell",
year = "2013",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1093/jel/eqt001",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "125--136",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Law",
issn = "1464-374X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - After Doha

T2 - what has climate change policy accomplished?

AU - Campbell, David

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - At the end of the Doha Climate Change Conference and of the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol, it is incontrovertible that 20 years of international climate change policy has failed to secure a reduction in global emissions. Bringing up to date an argument first made in 2007, this note explains this failure as a result of the legal position established by those negotiations. Contrary to general belief, it is not the case that no legally binding agreement over emissions has been established. One has been established, but it has been to grant to the major industrialising countries a permission to emit as much as they wish. The emissions of these countries have never been capped, and the operation of the Clean Development Mechanism, which, by the nature of its design, logically cannot prevent a growth of emissions, has been a failure. The increase of major industrialising countries’ emissions has made the policy of mitigating growth of global emissions impossible from the start and makes it impossible now.

AB - At the end of the Doha Climate Change Conference and of the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol, it is incontrovertible that 20 years of international climate change policy has failed to secure a reduction in global emissions. Bringing up to date an argument first made in 2007, this note explains this failure as a result of the legal position established by those negotiations. Contrary to general belief, it is not the case that no legally binding agreement over emissions has been established. One has been established, but it has been to grant to the major industrialising countries a permission to emit as much as they wish. The emissions of these countries have never been capped, and the operation of the Clean Development Mechanism, which, by the nature of its design, logically cannot prevent a growth of emissions, has been a failure. The increase of major industrialising countries’ emissions has made the policy of mitigating growth of global emissions impossible from the start and makes it impossible now.

U2 - 10.1093/jel/eqt001

DO - 10.1093/jel/eqt001

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 125

EP - 136

JO - Journal of Environmental Law

JF - Journal of Environmental Law

SN - 1464-374X

IS - 1

ER -