Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Afterword: Sectarianisation Beyond the Middle East

Electronic data

  • MABON_R1_for_production_93_

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Religion, State and Society on 02/06/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09637494.2021.1893085

    Accepted author manuscript, 176 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Afterword: Sectarianisation Beyond the Middle East

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Afterword: Sectarianisation Beyond the Middle East. / Mabon, Simon.
In: Religion, State and Society, Vol. 49, No. 2, 30.06.2021, p. 174-180.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Mabon, S 2021, 'Afterword: Sectarianisation Beyond the Middle East', Religion, State and Society, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2021.1893085

APA

Vancouver

Mabon S. Afterword: Sectarianisation Beyond the Middle East. Religion, State and Society. 2021 Jun 30;49(2):174-180. Epub 2021 Jun 2. doi: 10.1080/09637494.2021.1893085

Author

Mabon, Simon. / Afterword: Sectarianisation Beyond the Middle East. In: Religion, State and Society. 2021 ; Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. 174-180.

Bibtex

@article{ba08a11a657e4fd1bd84870698e03d17,
title = "Afterword: Sectarianisation Beyond the Middle East",
abstract = "Sectarianisation, a conceptual approach proposed by Nader Hashemi and Danny Postel, has gained a great deal of traction in the study of sectarianism in the contemporary Middle East. Yet despite its popularity, little attention has been paid to the ways in which sectarianisation can operate beyond the Middle East, a peculiar point when considering that only 20% of the world{\textquoteright}s 1.57 billion Muslims live in the region. This brief intervention explores the ways in which the sectarianisation thesis can operate beyond the Middle East, looking at some of the ontological, epistemological, and methodological questions that are bound up in such an approach. Ultimately, I argue that while sectarianism has become a prominent feature in academic discussions about the Middle East – driven recently by a focus on sectarianisation – there is merit in exploring the application of Hashemi and Postel{\textquoteright}s thesis in regions beyond the Middle East.",
keywords = "Sectarianism, sectarianisation, securitisation, Middle East",
author = "Simon Mabon",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Religion, State and Society on 02/06/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09637494.2021.1893085",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/09637494.2021.1893085",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "174--180",
journal = "Religion, State and Society",
issn = "0963-7494",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Afterword: Sectarianisation Beyond the Middle East

AU - Mabon, Simon

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Religion, State and Society on 02/06/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09637494.2021.1893085

PY - 2021/6/30

Y1 - 2021/6/30

N2 - Sectarianisation, a conceptual approach proposed by Nader Hashemi and Danny Postel, has gained a great deal of traction in the study of sectarianism in the contemporary Middle East. Yet despite its popularity, little attention has been paid to the ways in which sectarianisation can operate beyond the Middle East, a peculiar point when considering that only 20% of the world’s 1.57 billion Muslims live in the region. This brief intervention explores the ways in which the sectarianisation thesis can operate beyond the Middle East, looking at some of the ontological, epistemological, and methodological questions that are bound up in such an approach. Ultimately, I argue that while sectarianism has become a prominent feature in academic discussions about the Middle East – driven recently by a focus on sectarianisation – there is merit in exploring the application of Hashemi and Postel’s thesis in regions beyond the Middle East.

AB - Sectarianisation, a conceptual approach proposed by Nader Hashemi and Danny Postel, has gained a great deal of traction in the study of sectarianism in the contemporary Middle East. Yet despite its popularity, little attention has been paid to the ways in which sectarianisation can operate beyond the Middle East, a peculiar point when considering that only 20% of the world’s 1.57 billion Muslims live in the region. This brief intervention explores the ways in which the sectarianisation thesis can operate beyond the Middle East, looking at some of the ontological, epistemological, and methodological questions that are bound up in such an approach. Ultimately, I argue that while sectarianism has become a prominent feature in academic discussions about the Middle East – driven recently by a focus on sectarianisation – there is merit in exploring the application of Hashemi and Postel’s thesis in regions beyond the Middle East.

KW - Sectarianism

KW - sectarianisation

KW - securitisation

KW - Middle East

U2 - 10.1080/09637494.2021.1893085

DO - 10.1080/09637494.2021.1893085

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49

SP - 174

EP - 180

JO - Religion, State and Society

JF - Religion, State and Society

SN - 0963-7494

IS - 2

ER -