Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Against and For China’s Ecological Civilisation

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Against and For China’s Ecological Civilisation: Economising the Bios or “Life-ising” Transition?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Against and For China’s Ecological Civilisation: Economising the Bios or “Life-ising” Transition? / Tyfield, David; Rodriguez, Fabricio.
In: International Quarterly of Asian Studies, Vol. 53, No. 3, 23.11.2022, p. 441-469.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Tyfield D, Rodriguez F. Against and For China’s Ecological Civilisation: Economising the Bios or “Life-ising” Transition? International Quarterly of Asian Studies. 2022 Nov 23;53(3):441-469. doi: 10.11588/iqas.2022.3.15525

Author

Tyfield, David ; Rodriguez, Fabricio. / Against and For China’s Ecological Civilisation : Economising the Bios or “Life-ising” Transition?. In: International Quarterly of Asian Studies. 2022 ; Vol. 53, No. 3. pp. 441-469.

Bibtex

@article{5aba5dd6d2d645b098d4cb275e60adc4,
title = "Against and For China{\textquoteright}s Ecological Civilisation: Economising the Bios or “Life-ising” Transition?",
abstract = "As the climate crisis intensifies, overlapping with the emergence of a lethal virus, and a planet poisoning economy, questions regarding thinking-and-doing transition become increasingly urgent. In this article, we explore the concept of “ecological civilisation” (EcoCiv) as a productive conjunction of Chinese concepts and ways of thinking that precede China{\textquoteright}s encounter with Western modernity, and their re-reading and revision from a post-Western modernity lens. China{\textquoteright}s role in any possible global transition to sustainability is unquestionably central – yet curiously neglected in transition studies. At the same time the official project of EcoCiv is in fact emerging as the very opposite of its proclaimed spirit. The article offers a reconceptualisation of shengtai wenming (ecological civilisation) as a paradigm shift to life-ising the economy (and society) instead of economising life. From this altered perspective, the article presents and discusses preliminary evidence of a largely neglected, but potentially significant, bottom-up, extra-state dynamism in contemporary China that entails both elements and principles for a genuinely ecological, trans-modern civilisation. It concludes with reflections on the resulting change in agenda, not least for transition studies, outlining a set of four principles of doing shengtai wenming – i.e. of life-ising transition.",
keywords = "China, shengtai wenming, ecological civilisation, trans-modernity, transition, life-ising, sustainability",
author = "David Tyfield and Fabricio Rodriguez",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
day = "23",
doi = "10.11588/iqas.2022.3.15525",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "441--469",
journal = "International Quarterly of Asian Studies",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Against and For China’s Ecological Civilisation

T2 - Economising the Bios or “Life-ising” Transition?

AU - Tyfield, David

AU - Rodriguez, Fabricio

PY - 2022/11/23

Y1 - 2022/11/23

N2 - As the climate crisis intensifies, overlapping with the emergence of a lethal virus, and a planet poisoning economy, questions regarding thinking-and-doing transition become increasingly urgent. In this article, we explore the concept of “ecological civilisation” (EcoCiv) as a productive conjunction of Chinese concepts and ways of thinking that precede China’s encounter with Western modernity, and their re-reading and revision from a post-Western modernity lens. China’s role in any possible global transition to sustainability is unquestionably central – yet curiously neglected in transition studies. At the same time the official project of EcoCiv is in fact emerging as the very opposite of its proclaimed spirit. The article offers a reconceptualisation of shengtai wenming (ecological civilisation) as a paradigm shift to life-ising the economy (and society) instead of economising life. From this altered perspective, the article presents and discusses preliminary evidence of a largely neglected, but potentially significant, bottom-up, extra-state dynamism in contemporary China that entails both elements and principles for a genuinely ecological, trans-modern civilisation. It concludes with reflections on the resulting change in agenda, not least for transition studies, outlining a set of four principles of doing shengtai wenming – i.e. of life-ising transition.

AB - As the climate crisis intensifies, overlapping with the emergence of a lethal virus, and a planet poisoning economy, questions regarding thinking-and-doing transition become increasingly urgent. In this article, we explore the concept of “ecological civilisation” (EcoCiv) as a productive conjunction of Chinese concepts and ways of thinking that precede China’s encounter with Western modernity, and their re-reading and revision from a post-Western modernity lens. China’s role in any possible global transition to sustainability is unquestionably central – yet curiously neglected in transition studies. At the same time the official project of EcoCiv is in fact emerging as the very opposite of its proclaimed spirit. The article offers a reconceptualisation of shengtai wenming (ecological civilisation) as a paradigm shift to life-ising the economy (and society) instead of economising life. From this altered perspective, the article presents and discusses preliminary evidence of a largely neglected, but potentially significant, bottom-up, extra-state dynamism in contemporary China that entails both elements and principles for a genuinely ecological, trans-modern civilisation. It concludes with reflections on the resulting change in agenda, not least for transition studies, outlining a set of four principles of doing shengtai wenming – i.e. of life-ising transition.

KW - China

KW - shengtai wenming

KW - ecological civilisation

KW - trans-modernity

KW - transition

KW - life-ising

KW - sustainability

U2 - 10.11588/iqas.2022.3.15525

DO - 10.11588/iqas.2022.3.15525

M3 - Journal article

VL - 53

SP - 441

EP - 469

JO - International Quarterly of Asian Studies

JF - International Quarterly of Asian Studies

IS - 3

ER -