Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Against your better judgment? How organization...

Electronic data

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgment in forecasting

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgment in forecasting. / Fildes, R A; Goodwin, P.
N/A: unknown, 2007. (Interfaces).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@techreport{aa3419ba215642e4b764dd55f3559b2b,
title = "Against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgment in forecasting",
abstract = "Accurate forecasts are crucial to successful planning in many organizations and in 2001 forty international experts published a set of principles to guide best practice in forecasting. Some of the principles relate to the use management judgment. Almost all organisations use judgment at some stage in their forecasting process, but do they do so effectively? While judgment can lead to significant improvements in forecasting accuracy, it can also suffer from biases and inconsistency. The principles therefore indicate how forecasters should use judgment and how they should assess its effectiveness. The question we examine is whether judgment is used according to these established principles. We conducted a survey of 120 forecasters to investigate whether their forecasting procedures were consistent with the principles. In addition, we conducted four in-depth case studies. We found examples of good practice. However, many organizations could improve forecast accuracy if they followed basic principles like limiting judgmental adjustments of quantitative forecasts, asking managers to justify their adjustments in writing and assessing the track record of judgmental interventions.",
author = "Fildes, {R A} and P Goodwin",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1287/inte.1070.0309",
language = "English",
isbn = "0092-2102",
volume = "37",
series = "Interfaces",
publisher = "unknown",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "unknown",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgment in forecasting

AU - Fildes, R A

AU - Goodwin, P

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Accurate forecasts are crucial to successful planning in many organizations and in 2001 forty international experts published a set of principles to guide best practice in forecasting. Some of the principles relate to the use management judgment. Almost all organisations use judgment at some stage in their forecasting process, but do they do so effectively? While judgment can lead to significant improvements in forecasting accuracy, it can also suffer from biases and inconsistency. The principles therefore indicate how forecasters should use judgment and how they should assess its effectiveness. The question we examine is whether judgment is used according to these established principles. We conducted a survey of 120 forecasters to investigate whether their forecasting procedures were consistent with the principles. In addition, we conducted four in-depth case studies. We found examples of good practice. However, many organizations could improve forecast accuracy if they followed basic principles like limiting judgmental adjustments of quantitative forecasts, asking managers to justify their adjustments in writing and assessing the track record of judgmental interventions.

AB - Accurate forecasts are crucial to successful planning in many organizations and in 2001 forty international experts published a set of principles to guide best practice in forecasting. Some of the principles relate to the use management judgment. Almost all organisations use judgment at some stage in their forecasting process, but do they do so effectively? While judgment can lead to significant improvements in forecasting accuracy, it can also suffer from biases and inconsistency. The principles therefore indicate how forecasters should use judgment and how they should assess its effectiveness. The question we examine is whether judgment is used according to these established principles. We conducted a survey of 120 forecasters to investigate whether their forecasting procedures were consistent with the principles. In addition, we conducted four in-depth case studies. We found examples of good practice. However, many organizations could improve forecast accuracy if they followed basic principles like limiting judgmental adjustments of quantitative forecasts, asking managers to justify their adjustments in writing and assessing the track record of judgmental interventions.

U2 - 10.1287/inte.1070.0309

DO - 10.1287/inte.1070.0309

M3 - Working paper

SN - 0092-2102

VL - 37

T3 - Interfaces

BT - Against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgment in forecasting

PB - unknown

CY - N/A

ER -