Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood p...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across Indian rural communities

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across Indian rural communities. / Berchoux, T.; Watmough, G.R.; Hutton, C.W.; Atkinson, P.M.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 189, 01.09.2019, p. 307-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Berchoux, T. ; Watmough, G.R. ; Hutton, C.W. ; Atkinson, P.M. / Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across Indian rural communities. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2019 ; Vol. 189. pp. 307-319.

Bibtex

@article{0b8b620886514eb086ad5202e5f29c77,
title = "Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across Indian rural communities",
abstract = "Spatial factors, such as environmental conditions, distance to natural resources and access to services can influence the impacts of climate change on rural household livelihood activities. But neither the determinants of precarious livelihoods nor their spatial context has been well understood. This paper investigates the drivers of livelihood precariousness using a place-based approach. We identify five community types in rural regions of the Mahanadi Delta, India; exurban, agro-industrial, rainfed agriculture, irrigated agriculture and resource periphery by clustering three types of community capitals (natural, social and physical). Based on this typology, we characterise the associations between precarious livelihood activities (unemployment or engagement in agricultural labour) with agricultural shocks and household capitals. Results demonstrate that, the type of community influences the impact of agricultural shocks on livelihoods as four of the five community types had increased likelihoods of precarious livelihoods being pursued when agricultural shocks increased. Our research demonstrates that the bundle of locally available community capitals influences households' coping strategies and livelihood opportunities. For example, higher levels of physical capital were associated with a lower likelihood of precarious livelihoods in agro-industrial communities but had no significant impact in the other four. Results also indicate that agricultural shocks drive livelihood precariousness (odds ratios between 1.03 and 1.07) for all but the best-connected communities, while access to household capitals tends to reduce it. Our results suggest that poverty alleviation programmes should include community typologies in their approach to provide place-specific interventions that would strengthen context-specific household capitals, thus reducing livelihood precariousness. {\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors",
keywords = "Agricultural shocks, Chronic poverty, Community typologies, India, Livelihoods, Rural development, Climate change, Regional planning, Agriculture",
author = "T. Berchoux and G.R. Watmough and C.W. Hutton and P.M. Atkinson",
year = "2019",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.014",
language = "English",
volume = "189",
pages = "307--319",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across Indian rural communities

AU - Berchoux, T.

AU - Watmough, G.R.

AU - Hutton, C.W.

AU - Atkinson, P.M.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Spatial factors, such as environmental conditions, distance to natural resources and access to services can influence the impacts of climate change on rural household livelihood activities. But neither the determinants of precarious livelihoods nor their spatial context has been well understood. This paper investigates the drivers of livelihood precariousness using a place-based approach. We identify five community types in rural regions of the Mahanadi Delta, India; exurban, agro-industrial, rainfed agriculture, irrigated agriculture and resource periphery by clustering three types of community capitals (natural, social and physical). Based on this typology, we characterise the associations between precarious livelihood activities (unemployment or engagement in agricultural labour) with agricultural shocks and household capitals. Results demonstrate that, the type of community influences the impact of agricultural shocks on livelihoods as four of the five community types had increased likelihoods of precarious livelihoods being pursued when agricultural shocks increased. Our research demonstrates that the bundle of locally available community capitals influences households' coping strategies and livelihood opportunities. For example, higher levels of physical capital were associated with a lower likelihood of precarious livelihoods in agro-industrial communities but had no significant impact in the other four. Results also indicate that agricultural shocks drive livelihood precariousness (odds ratios between 1.03 and 1.07) for all but the best-connected communities, while access to household capitals tends to reduce it. Our results suggest that poverty alleviation programmes should include community typologies in their approach to provide place-specific interventions that would strengthen context-specific household capitals, thus reducing livelihood precariousness. © 2019 The Authors

AB - Spatial factors, such as environmental conditions, distance to natural resources and access to services can influence the impacts of climate change on rural household livelihood activities. But neither the determinants of precarious livelihoods nor their spatial context has been well understood. This paper investigates the drivers of livelihood precariousness using a place-based approach. We identify five community types in rural regions of the Mahanadi Delta, India; exurban, agro-industrial, rainfed agriculture, irrigated agriculture and resource periphery by clustering three types of community capitals (natural, social and physical). Based on this typology, we characterise the associations between precarious livelihood activities (unemployment or engagement in agricultural labour) with agricultural shocks and household capitals. Results demonstrate that, the type of community influences the impact of agricultural shocks on livelihoods as four of the five community types had increased likelihoods of precarious livelihoods being pursued when agricultural shocks increased. Our research demonstrates that the bundle of locally available community capitals influences households' coping strategies and livelihood opportunities. For example, higher levels of physical capital were associated with a lower likelihood of precarious livelihoods in agro-industrial communities but had no significant impact in the other four. Results also indicate that agricultural shocks drive livelihood precariousness (odds ratios between 1.03 and 1.07) for all but the best-connected communities, while access to household capitals tends to reduce it. Our results suggest that poverty alleviation programmes should include community typologies in their approach to provide place-specific interventions that would strengthen context-specific household capitals, thus reducing livelihood precariousness. © 2019 The Authors

KW - Agricultural shocks

KW - Chronic poverty

KW - Community typologies

KW - India

KW - Livelihoods

KW - Rural development

KW - Climate change

KW - Regional planning

KW - Agriculture

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.014

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.014

M3 - Journal article

VL - 189

SP - 307

EP - 319

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

ER -