Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Airport capacity vs. demand: Mismatch or misman...
View graph of relations

Airport capacity vs. demand: Mismatch or mismanagement?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Airport capacity vs. demand: Mismatch or mismanagement? / Madas, Michael A.; Zografos, Konstantinos G.
In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 203-226.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Madas, MA & Zografos, KG 2008, 'Airport capacity vs. demand: Mismatch or mismanagement?', Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 203-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.08.002

APA

Madas, M. A., & Zografos, K. G. (2008). Airport capacity vs. demand: Mismatch or mismanagement? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1), 203-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.08.002

Vancouver

Madas MA, Zografos KG. Airport capacity vs. demand: Mismatch or mismanagement? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2008 Jan 1;42(1):203-226. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2007.08.002

Author

Madas, Michael A. ; Zografos, Konstantinos G. / Airport capacity vs. demand: Mismatch or mismanagement?. In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2008 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 203-226.

Bibtex

@article{24b1761446524fff9e8197f37ac30c9d,
title = "Airport capacity vs. demand: Mismatch or mismanagement?",
abstract = "Since well-publicized congestion and delay problems encountered by European and US airports entered the political arena, there is an unprecedented pressure experienced by policy makers upon investigating and adopting strategies for managing demand and allocating scarce airport capacity. During the last few years, there is an ongoing policy debate within the European Community to undertake further work for a drastically revised regulatory framework aiming to deal with the scarcity of airport capacity through the efficient allocation of airport slots. One of the primary policy concerns lies on the compatibility of alternative slot allocation strategies in different airport settings. The objective of this paper is threefold: (i) to develop and apply a methodological framework for the multi-criteria evaluation and selection of the most compatible slot allocation strategy with respect to policy criteria and priorities in various airport settings, (ii) to examine the applicability of policy compatibility results in various airport settings and their potential acceptability from different industry stakeholders, and (iii) to provide policy recommendations for European airport policy making and planning.",
keywords = "Policy compatibility analysis, Airport slot allocation , Airport capacity management , Multi-criteria evaluation",
author = "Madas, {Michael A.} and Zografos, {Konstantinos G.}",
year = "2008",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tra.2007.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "203--226",
journal = "Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice",
issn = "0965-8564",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Airport capacity vs. demand: Mismatch or mismanagement?

AU - Madas, Michael A.

AU - Zografos, Konstantinos G.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Since well-publicized congestion and delay problems encountered by European and US airports entered the political arena, there is an unprecedented pressure experienced by policy makers upon investigating and adopting strategies for managing demand and allocating scarce airport capacity. During the last few years, there is an ongoing policy debate within the European Community to undertake further work for a drastically revised regulatory framework aiming to deal with the scarcity of airport capacity through the efficient allocation of airport slots. One of the primary policy concerns lies on the compatibility of alternative slot allocation strategies in different airport settings. The objective of this paper is threefold: (i) to develop and apply a methodological framework for the multi-criteria evaluation and selection of the most compatible slot allocation strategy with respect to policy criteria and priorities in various airport settings, (ii) to examine the applicability of policy compatibility results in various airport settings and their potential acceptability from different industry stakeholders, and (iii) to provide policy recommendations for European airport policy making and planning.

AB - Since well-publicized congestion and delay problems encountered by European and US airports entered the political arena, there is an unprecedented pressure experienced by policy makers upon investigating and adopting strategies for managing demand and allocating scarce airport capacity. During the last few years, there is an ongoing policy debate within the European Community to undertake further work for a drastically revised regulatory framework aiming to deal with the scarcity of airport capacity through the efficient allocation of airport slots. One of the primary policy concerns lies on the compatibility of alternative slot allocation strategies in different airport settings. The objective of this paper is threefold: (i) to develop and apply a methodological framework for the multi-criteria evaluation and selection of the most compatible slot allocation strategy with respect to policy criteria and priorities in various airport settings, (ii) to examine the applicability of policy compatibility results in various airport settings and their potential acceptability from different industry stakeholders, and (iii) to provide policy recommendations for European airport policy making and planning.

KW - Policy compatibility analysis

KW - Airport slot allocation

KW - Airport capacity management

KW - Multi-criteria evaluation

U2 - 10.1016/j.tra.2007.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.tra.2007.08.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 203

EP - 226

JO - Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

JF - Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

SN - 0965-8564

IS - 1

ER -