Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Studies on Security on 02/05/2020 available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21624887.2020.1760587
Accepted author manuscript, 231 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Algorithmic Warfare and the Reinvention of Accuracy
AU - Suchman, Lucy
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Studies on Security on 02/05/2020 available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21624887.2020.1760587
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - This article aims to integrate two interrelated strands in critical security studies. The first is mounting evidence for the fallacy of claims for precision and accuracy in the United States ‘counterterrorism’ programme, particularly as it involves expanding aerial surveillance in support of operations of extrajudicial assassination. The second line of critical analysis concerns growing investment in the further automation of these operations, more specifically in the form of the US Department of Defense Algorithmic Warfare Cross-Functional Team, or Project Maven. Building upon generative intersections of critical security studies and science and technology studies (STS), I argue that the promotion of automated data analysis under the sign of artificial intelligence can only serve to exacerbate military operations that are at once discriminatory and indiscriminate in their targeting, while remaining politically and legally unaccountable.
AB - This article aims to integrate two interrelated strands in critical security studies. The first is mounting evidence for the fallacy of claims for precision and accuracy in the United States ‘counterterrorism’ programme, particularly as it involves expanding aerial surveillance in support of operations of extrajudicial assassination. The second line of critical analysis concerns growing investment in the further automation of these operations, more specifically in the form of the US Department of Defense Algorithmic Warfare Cross-Functional Team, or Project Maven. Building upon generative intersections of critical security studies and science and technology studies (STS), I argue that the promotion of automated data analysis under the sign of artificial intelligence can only serve to exacerbate military operations that are at once discriminatory and indiscriminate in their targeting, while remaining politically and legally unaccountable.
KW - mlitary
KW - targeting
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - weapons
U2 - 10.1080/21624887.2020.1760587
DO - 10.1080/21624887.2020.1760587
M3 - Journal article
VL - 8
SP - 175
EP - 187
JO - Critical Studies on Security
JF - Critical Studies on Security
SN - 2162-4887
IS - 2
ER -