Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > All click, no action?

Electronic data

  • REVISED_Online_action_and_future_collective_action_Main_Document_CHB

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Computers in Human Behavior. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.007

    Accepted author manuscript, 758 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

All click, no action?: Online action, efficacy perceptions, and prior experience combine to affect future collective action

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

All click, no action? Online action, efficacy perceptions, and prior experience combine to affect future collective action. / Wilkins, Denise J.; Livingstone, Andrew G.; Levine, Mark.

In: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 91, 01.02.2019, p. 97-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Wilkins, Denise J. ; Livingstone, Andrew G. ; Levine, Mark. / All click, no action? Online action, efficacy perceptions, and prior experience combine to affect future collective action. In: Computers in Human Behavior. 2019 ; Vol. 91. pp. 97-105.

Bibtex

@article{5529cf6d6dd6490aa99efde728820146,
title = "All click, no action?: Online action, efficacy perceptions, and prior experience combine to affect future collective action",
abstract = "Social media is increasingly used for social protest, but does internet-enabled action lead to {\textquoteleft}slacktivism{\textquoteright} or promote increased activism? We show that the answer to this question depends on prior level of activism, and on beliefs about the effectiveness of individual contribution to the collective campaign. Internet-enabled action was varied quasi-experimentally, with participants (n = 143) choosing whether or not to share a campaign on social media. Participants were then informed that sharing on social media had a big (high action efficacy) or small (low action efficacy) impact on achieving the campaign's goal. Prior levels of activism were measured before the experiment, and general levels of collective action were measured one week after the experiment. Taking internet-enabled action for one campaign increased future activism for other campaigns – but only in individuals who were already active and who perceived their actions to be an effective contribution to the campaign.",
keywords = "Activism, Collective action, Participative efficacy, Slacktivism, Social media",
author = "Wilkins, {Denise J.} and Livingstone, {Andrew G.} and Mark Levine",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Computers in Human Behavior. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.007",
year = "2019",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.007",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "97--105",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - All click, no action?

T2 - Online action, efficacy perceptions, and prior experience combine to affect future collective action

AU - Wilkins, Denise J.

AU - Livingstone, Andrew G.

AU - Levine, Mark

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Computers in Human Behavior. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.007

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Social media is increasingly used for social protest, but does internet-enabled action lead to ‘slacktivism’ or promote increased activism? We show that the answer to this question depends on prior level of activism, and on beliefs about the effectiveness of individual contribution to the collective campaign. Internet-enabled action was varied quasi-experimentally, with participants (n = 143) choosing whether or not to share a campaign on social media. Participants were then informed that sharing on social media had a big (high action efficacy) or small (low action efficacy) impact on achieving the campaign's goal. Prior levels of activism were measured before the experiment, and general levels of collective action were measured one week after the experiment. Taking internet-enabled action for one campaign increased future activism for other campaigns – but only in individuals who were already active and who perceived their actions to be an effective contribution to the campaign.

AB - Social media is increasingly used for social protest, but does internet-enabled action lead to ‘slacktivism’ or promote increased activism? We show that the answer to this question depends on prior level of activism, and on beliefs about the effectiveness of individual contribution to the collective campaign. Internet-enabled action was varied quasi-experimentally, with participants (n = 143) choosing whether or not to share a campaign on social media. Participants were then informed that sharing on social media had a big (high action efficacy) or small (low action efficacy) impact on achieving the campaign's goal. Prior levels of activism were measured before the experiment, and general levels of collective action were measured one week after the experiment. Taking internet-enabled action for one campaign increased future activism for other campaigns – but only in individuals who were already active and who perceived their actions to be an effective contribution to the campaign.

KW - Activism

KW - Collective action

KW - Participative efficacy

KW - Slacktivism

KW - Social media

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.007

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85054815287

VL - 91

SP - 97

EP - 105

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

ER -