Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > All-pay competition with captive consumers

Electronic data

View graph of relations

All-pay competition with captive consumers

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

All-pay competition with captive consumers. / Foucart, Renaud; Friedrichsen, Jana.
Lancaster: The Department of Economics, 2019. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Foucart, R & Friedrichsen, J 2019 'All-pay competition with captive consumers' Economics Working Papers Series, The Department of Economics, Lancaster.

APA

Foucart, R., & Friedrichsen, J. (2019). All-pay competition with captive consumers. (Economics Working Papers Series). The Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Foucart R, Friedrichsen J. All-pay competition with captive consumers. Lancaster: The Department of Economics. 2019 Oct. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Author

Foucart, Renaud ; Friedrichsen, Jana. / All-pay competition with captive consumers. Lancaster : The Department of Economics, 2019. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{4c38e6fbf83f4c1cabc4ac95c0dbafba,
title = "All-pay competition with captive consumers",
abstract = "We study a game in which two firms compete in quality to serve a market consisting of consumers with different initial consideration sets. If both firms invest below a certain quality threshold, they only compete for those consumers already aware of their existence. Above this threshold, a firm is visible to all and the highest quality attracts all consumers. In equilibrium, firms do not choose their investment deterministically but randomize over two disconnected intervals. On the one hand, the existence of initially captive consumers introduces an anti-competitive element: holding fixed the behavior of the rival firm, a firm with a larger captive segment enjoys a higher payoff from not investing at all. On the other hand, the fact that a firm{\textquoteright}s initially captive consumers can still be attracted by very high quality introduces a pro-competitive element: high quality investments becomes more profitable for the underdog when the captive segment of the dominant firm increases. The share of initially captive consumers therefore has a non-monotonic effect on the investment levels of both firms.",
keywords = "quality competition, all-pay auction, endogenous prize, consideration sets",
author = "Renaud Foucart and Jana Friedrichsen",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Papers Series",
publisher = "The Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - All-pay competition with captive consumers

AU - Foucart, Renaud

AU - Friedrichsen, Jana

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - We study a game in which two firms compete in quality to serve a market consisting of consumers with different initial consideration sets. If both firms invest below a certain quality threshold, they only compete for those consumers already aware of their existence. Above this threshold, a firm is visible to all and the highest quality attracts all consumers. In equilibrium, firms do not choose their investment deterministically but randomize over two disconnected intervals. On the one hand, the existence of initially captive consumers introduces an anti-competitive element: holding fixed the behavior of the rival firm, a firm with a larger captive segment enjoys a higher payoff from not investing at all. On the other hand, the fact that a firm’s initially captive consumers can still be attracted by very high quality introduces a pro-competitive element: high quality investments becomes more profitable for the underdog when the captive segment of the dominant firm increases. The share of initially captive consumers therefore has a non-monotonic effect on the investment levels of both firms.

AB - We study a game in which two firms compete in quality to serve a market consisting of consumers with different initial consideration sets. If both firms invest below a certain quality threshold, they only compete for those consumers already aware of their existence. Above this threshold, a firm is visible to all and the highest quality attracts all consumers. In equilibrium, firms do not choose their investment deterministically but randomize over two disconnected intervals. On the one hand, the existence of initially captive consumers introduces an anti-competitive element: holding fixed the behavior of the rival firm, a firm with a larger captive segment enjoys a higher payoff from not investing at all. On the other hand, the fact that a firm’s initially captive consumers can still be attracted by very high quality introduces a pro-competitive element: high quality investments becomes more profitable for the underdog when the captive segment of the dominant firm increases. The share of initially captive consumers therefore has a non-monotonic effect on the investment levels of both firms.

KW - quality competition

KW - all-pay auction

KW - endogenous prize

KW - consideration sets

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Papers Series

BT - All-pay competition with captive consumers

PB - The Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster

ER -